Volume 8, Issue 15 (6-2017)
Res Anim Prod 2017, 8(15): 84-95 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
(2017). Study of Chemical Composition, Quality and Ruminal
Degradability Parameters of Silaged Orange Pulp with Wheat Straw and Urea
. Res Anim Prod. 8(15), 84-95. doi:10.29252/rap.8.15.84
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-749-en.html
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-749-en.html
Abstract: (4240 Views)
The experiment was carried out to evaluate the effect of wheat straw and urea additives on chemical composition, quality characteristics and ruminal degradability parameters of dry matter, neutral detergent insoluble fiber and crude protein orange pulp silage, in a completely randomized design, using nylon bag technique in the form of fore treatments (citrus pulp 1. without additive, 2. with 40% wheat straw, 3. with 38.5% wheat straw and 1.5 % urea, 4. with 37% wheat straw and 3% urea). Results showed that treatment 2 had the highest score on visual assessment of silage. Treatment 1 and 4 had the lowest (3.53) and highest (4.36) pH respectively. Adding wheat straw to orange pulp increased dry matter (DM), ash and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), decreased non fiber carbohydrate (NFC) and ether extract. Urea increased crude protein, pH and NH3-N contents and decreased NFC. Flight point in treatments 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 90.72, 113.64, 94.54 and 82.75, respectively. Treatment 1 had the highest dry matter,s a, b and a+b. Adding wheat straw and urea significantly decreased dry matter degradability compared to the control treatment. Treatment 2 had the lowest protein,s a and a+b but adding wheat straw decreased protein degradability. Treatments 1 and 3 and treatment 2 had the highest and lowest NDF,s a respectively, treatment 3 and treatments 1 had the highest and lowest NDF,s b and a+b therefore additives increased NDF degradability. The results showed that with mixture of orange pulp, wheat straw and urea, can be prepared high quality silage; but through increasing urea more than 1/5 %, for improving the quality of silage soluble carbohydrate source is required. So, with increasing the urea the level of citrus pulp should be increased.
References
1. Alikhany, M., A. Asadi Alamuti, G.H. Ghorbani and N. Sadeghi. 2005. Effect of Molasses, Urea and Bacterial Inoculation on Chemical Composition and Dry Matter Degradability of Sunflower Silage, Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 3: 18-171 (In Persian).
2. Arbabi, S., T. Ghoorchi and A.A. Naserian. 2008. The Effect of Dried Citrus Pulp, Dried Sugar Beet Pulp and Wheat Straw as Silage Additives on by Product of Orange Silage. Asian Journal of Animal Science, 2: 35-42. [DOI:10.3923/ajas.2008.35.42]
3. AOAC International. 2002. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th edition. 1st revision. Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Association of Analytical Communities.
4. Bampidis, V.A. and P.H. Robinson. 2006. Citrus by-Products as Ruminant Feeds: A Review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 128: 175-217. [DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.12.002]
5. Chapman, H.L., C.B. Ammerman, F.S. Baker, J.F. Hentges, B.W. Hayes and T.J. Cunha. 2000. Citrus Feeds for Beef Cattle. Cooperative Extension Service, Instite of Food and Agriculture Science, University of Florida. Bullten, 751: 1-34.
6. Chaudhry, S. and M.Z. Naseer. 2006. Silages of Citrus Pulp-Poultry Litter-Corn Forage for Sheep. Pak. Journal of Agriculture Science, 43: 3-4.
7. Denek, N. and A. Can. 2007. Effect of Wheat Straw and Different Additives on Silage Quality and in vitro Dry Matter Digestibility of Wet Orange Pulp. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 6: 217-219.
8. Fazaeli, H. 1992. The Final Report of the Identification and Use of Citrus Waste and Residues in Animal Nutrition. Journal of Research and Construction, 14: 26-35 (In Persian).
9. Ghasemi, E. and S.M. Mehdizadeh. 2008. Investigation on Lime Pulp Silage Characteristics with Surplus Whole Date Addition as Animal Feed, Third National Congress of recycling and the use of Renewable Organic Resources in Agriculture, Khorasgan, Islamic Azad University of Khorasgan, 3: 1-8 (In Persian).
10. Gohl, B.I. 1978. Citrus by- Products for Animal Feed. FAO. Animal Production and Health, 12: 41-44.
11. Joy, M., X. Alibes and F. Munoz. 1991. Technology for Trearment of Straw with Urea in Mediterranean Climates. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 38: 319-333. [DOI:10.1016/0377-8401(92)90022-X]
12. Kilic, A. 1986. Silo Feed (Instruction, Education and Application Proposals). Bilgehan press, Izmir. 327 pp.
13. Kordi, M. and A. Nasserian. 2012. The Effect of Adding Different Levels of Wheat Bran on Chemical Composition, Fermentation Characteristics, Degradability Citrus Pulp Silage. The Fifth Congress of Animal Sciences, University of Isfahan, 5: 1-5 (In Persian).
14. Lashkari, S., A. Taghizadeh and A. Ayase. 2011. Estimation of Chemical Composition, Degradability and Fermentation Parameters Citrus Pulp Using (Nylon Bags and Gas Production) In Vitro. Journal of Animal Science, 23: 1-4 (In Persian).
15. Martinez, P.J. and J.F. Carmona. 1980. Composition of Citrus Pulp. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 5: 1-10. [DOI:10.1016/0377-8401(80)90005-X]
16. McDonald, P., A.R. Henderson and S.J.E. Heron. 1991. The Biochemistry of Silage. Second Edition. Chalcombe Publications 13 Higwoods Drive, Marlow Bottom, Marlow, Bucks SL73Pu. U.K.
17. Migwi, P.K., J.R. Gallagher and R.J. Van Barneveld. 2000. Effect of Molasses on Thefermentation Quality of Wheat Straw and Poultry Litter Ensiled with Citrus Pulp. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 40: 825-829. [DOI:10.1071/EA99011]
18. Minron, J., E. Yosef, D. Ben-Ghedalia, L.E. Chase, D.E. Bauman and R. Solomon. 2002. Digestibility by Dairy Cows of Monosaccharide Constituents in Total Mixed Rations Containing Citrus Pulp. Journal of Dairy Science, 85: 89-94. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74056-3]
19. Moharreri, A. 1993. Effect of Wheat Straw Treated with Urea and Molasses on the Ability to Use, Digestibility and the Ability to Produce Calves, M.Sc. Thesis and University of Mashhad (In Persian).
20. National Research Council (NRC). 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
21. Nazem, K., Y. Rouzbehan and A. Shojaosadati. 2008. The Nutritional Value of Citrus Pulp (Lemon and Orange) Treated with Fungus Neurospora sitophila. Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 12: 495-500 (In Persian).
22. Nguyon, X.T., T.T. Mai and H.S. Nguyon. 2002. Effects of Alkali Treatment and Silage Making on in sacco Degradability of Fresh Rice Straw. Department of animal production. Hanoi Agriculture University, pp: 1-6.
23. Orskov, E.R. and P. McDonald. 1979. The Estimation of Protein Degradability in the Rumen From Incubation Measurements Weighed According to Rate of Passage. Journal of Agriculture Science, 92: 499-503. [DOI:10.1017/S0021859600063048]
24. Paya, H., A. Taghizadeh, S. Lashkari and S. Shirmohammadi. 2012. Evaluation of Rumen Fermentation Kinetics of Someby-Products Using In Situ and In Vitro Gas Production Technique. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 45: 127-133.
25. Pereira, J.C. and J. González. 2004. Rumen Degradability of Dehydrated Beet Pulp and Dehydrated Citrus Pulp. Animal Research, 53: 99-110. [DOI:10.1051/animres:2004005]
26. Peterwen, S.C., C. Kuen-Jaw, K. Kwen-Sheng, H. Jennchung and Y. Bi. 1995. Studies on the Degradabilities of Feed Stuffs in Taiwan. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 55: 215-226. [DOI:10.1016/0377-8401(95)00798-R]
27. Ramalho Ribeiro, J.M.C. 1991. Treatment straw. Options Mediterraneennes- Serie Seminaires, 55-60.
28. AS. 2002. User's Guide: Statistics. Version 8.2 Edn. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
29. Turgut, L. and M. Yanar. 2004. In situ Dry Matter and Crude Protein Degradation Kinetics of Some Forages in Eastern Turkey. Small Ruminant Research, 52: 217-222. [DOI:10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00261-X]
30. Vakili, A., M. Daneshmesgaran and H. Nassirimoghaddam. 2007. The Chemical Properties, Dry Matter and Crude Protein Degradability Parameters of Alfalfa Silage Supplemented with Hydrochloric Acid and Urea and Their Effect on the Production Characteristics of Holstein Cows. Journal of Animal Science, 2: 1-13 (In Persian).
31. Van Soest, P., J.B. Robertwon and B.A. Lewis. 1991. Methods of Dietary Fibre, Neutral Detergent Fibre and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583-3597. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2]
32. Vanzant, E.S., R.S. Cochran and E.C. Titgemeyer. 1998. Standardization of In Situ Techniques for Ruminant Feedstuff Evaluation. Journal of Animal Science, 76: 2717-2729. [DOI:10.2527/1998.76102717x]
33. Viuda, M., Y. Ruiz, J. Fernández-López and A. Pérez. 2008. Antifungal Activity of Lemon (Citrus Lemon L.), Mandarin (c. reticulata L.), grapefruit (c. paridisi L.) and orange (c. sinensis) vs. essential oils. Food Control, 19: 1130. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.12.003]
34. Yassin, E.L., J.P. Fontenot and H. Chester. 1991. Fermentation Characteristics and Nutritional Value of Ruminal Contents and Blood Ensiled with Untreated or Sodium Hydroxide Treated Wheat Straw. Journal of Animal Science, 69: 1751-1759. [DOI:10.2527/1991.6941751x]
35. Za Za, A.I. and J. Abo Omar. 2008. Performance of Awassi Lambs Fed Citrus Pulp and Olive Cake Silage. Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. Hebron University Research Journal (A), 5: 63-75.
36. Zamira Villanueva, M., A. Ibarra1, P. Zárate, F. Briones, O.S. Escamilla, A. González and E. Gutiérrez. 2013. Productive Performance of Hair Lambs Fed Fresh Orange (Citrus sinensis) Residues Substituting Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) grains. Cuban. Journal of Agriculture Science, 47: 27-31.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
