دوره 12، شماره 32 - ( تابستان 1400 )
جلد 12 شماره 32 صفحات 41-31 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
gholipour H, rezaei M, kazemifard M. (2021). Effect of Adding Emulsifier to Diet Containing Different Levels of Energy on Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Gut Microbial Population and Ilium Digestibility in Broiler Chickens. Res Anim Prod. 12(32), 31-41. doi:10.52547/rap.12.32.31
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-1122-fa.html
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-1122-fa.html
قلی پور حامد، رضایی منصور، کاظمی فرد محمد. تأثیر امولسی فایر در جیره های حاوی سطوح متفاوت انرژی بر عملکرد، ویژگی‌های لاشه، جمعیت میکروبی روده و قابلیت هضم ایلئومی جوجه های گوشتی پژوهشهاي توليدات دامي 1400; 12 (32) :41-31 10.52547/rap.12.32.31
1- دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری
چکیده: (2317 مشاهده)
این پژوهش به منظور بررسی اثر افزودن امولسی فایر لسیتین در جیره های حاوی سطوح متفاوت انرژی بر عملکرد، خصوصیات لاشه و جمعیت میکروبی روده جوجه های گوشتی انجام شد. تعداد 200 قطعه جوجه یکروزه گوشتی (جنس نر) سویه تجاری راس 308 به 4 تیمار، 5 تکرار و 10 قطعه جوجه در هر تکرار در یک آزمایش در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی اختصاص داده شدند. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل: جیره حاوی روغن سویا با انرژی استاندارد، جیره حاوی روغن سویا با انرژی پایین، جیره حاوی روغن سویا با انرژی استاندارد + امولسی فایر، جیره حاوی روغن سویا با انرژی پایین + امولسی فایر بود. نتایج نشان داد که در مورد صفت افزایش وزن در کل دوره، با کاهش یافتن سطح انرژی وزن بدن جوجه ها افزایش یافت. همچنین در مورد صفت افزایش وزن در دوره پایانی و کل دوره، با افزایش یافتن سطح امولسی فایر، وزن بدن کاهش یافت. در مورد ضریب تبدیل، در دوره های آغازین، رشد و کل دوره، افزایش سطح امولسی فایر سبب افزایش ضریب تبدیل غذایی شد. در سایر صفات آزمایشی و دوره های مختلف پرورش اثرات آماری معنی داری با تغییر انرژی و افزودن امولسی فایر مشاهده نشد (0/05<p). درصد ران در جیره های با سطح انرژی بالا نسبت به سایر تیمارها بیشتر بود. ولی سایر صفات لاشه هیچ اثر معنی داری را نشان ندادند (0/05<p). هیچگونه اثری از تیمارها بر جمعیت میکروبی روده مشاهده نشد. نتایج مربوط به قابلیت هضم نشان داد که در مورد صفات ماده خشک، ماده آلی و چربی در جیره های استاندارد و حاوی امولسی فایر هضم کاهش یافت و در سایر صفات اثرات معنی داری مشاهده نشد (0/05<p). در کل میتوان بیان کرد که افزایش سطح انرژی سبب کاهش وزن و کاهش هضم مواد مغذی و افزودن امولسی فایر سبب کاهش وزن، افزایش ضریب تبدیل و کاهش هضم مواد مغذی شدند.
فهرست منابع
1. Aftab, U. 2009. Response of broilers to practical diets with different metabolizable energy and balanced protein concentrations. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 11: 169-173. [DOI:10.1590/S1516-635X2009000300005]
2. Andreotti, M.O., O.M. Junqueira, M.J.B. Barbosa, L.C. Cancherini, L.F. Araujo and E.A. Rodrigues. 2004. Tempo de transito intestinal, desempenho, características de carcaçae composiçao corporal de frangos de corte alimentados com raçoes isoenergéticas formuladas com diferentes níveis de óleo de soja. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 33(4): 870-879. [DOI:10.1590/S1516-35982004000400007]
3. Aydin, R. and M.E. Cook. 2004. The effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on egg yolk fatty acids and hatchability in Japanese quail. Poultry Science, 83: 2016-2022. [DOI:10.1093/ps/83.12.2016]
4. Dersiant, L. and M. Peisker. 2005. Soybean lecithin in animal nutrition, an unmatched additive. Kraftfutter, 88(1/2): 28-34.
5. Dumiru, D.L., D. Felmeri, O. Leah and V. Lacramioara. 2002. Investigation on the effect of lecithin in the mink production performances, Buletinul Universitatii de stn te Agricole si Medicina Veterinara Cluj Napoca. Seria Zootehniesiiotehnologii, 57: 155-157.
6. Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple ranges and multiple F-test. Biometrics, 11: 1-42. [DOI:10.2307/3001478]
7. Ferreira, G.D., M.F. Pinto, M.G. Neto, E.H. Ponsano, C.A.Goncalves, I.L. Bossolani and A.G. Pereira. 2015. Accurate adjustment of energy level in broiler chickens diet for controlling the performance and the lipid composition of meat. Ciencia Rural, 45: 104-110. [DOI:10.1590/0103-8478cr20130206]
8. Gaiotto, J.B. 2004. Determinação da energia metabolizável de gorduras e sua aplicação na formulação de dietas para frangos de corte [dissertação]. Piracicaba (SP): Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz.
9. Ghahremani, A., A.A. Sadeghi, S. Hesaraki, M. Chamani and P. Shawrang. 2016. Effect of energy sources and levels on caecal microbial population, jejunal morphology, gene expression of jejunal transporters (SGLT1, FABP) and performance of broilers under heat stress. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakuitesi Dergisi, 23(3): 415-422.
10. Guban, J., D.R. Korver, G.E. Allison and G.W. Tannock. 2006. Relationship of dietary antimicrobial drug administration with broiler performance, decreased population levels of Lactobacillus salivarius, and reduced bile salt deconjugation in the ileum of broiler chickens. Poultry science, 85: 2186-2194. [DOI:10.1093/ps/85.12.2186]
11. Houshmand, M., K. Azhar, I. Zulkifli, M.H. Bejo and A. Kamyab. 2011. Effects of nonantibiotic feed additives on performance, nutrient retention, gut pH, and intestinal morphology of broilers fed different levels of energy. Journal of Appllied Poultry Resarch, 20: 121-128. [DOI:10.3382/japr.2010-00171]
12. Huang, J., D. Yang and T. Wang. 2007. Effects of replacing soy-oil with soy-lecithin on growth performance, nutrient utilization and serum parameters of broilers fed corn-based diets. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 12: 1880-1886. [DOI:10.5713/ajas.2007.1880]
13. Innis, S.M., V. Pinsk and K. Jacobson. 2006. Dietary lipids and intestinal inflammatory diseases. The Journal Pediatrics, 58: 89-95. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.06.058]
14. Jafarnejad, S. and M. Sedegh. 2011. The effects of different levels of dietary protein, energy and using fat on the performance of broiler chicks at the end of the third weeks. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 5: 35-40. [DOI:10.3923/ajpsaj.2011.35.40]
15. Jeason, S.E. and T.F. Kellog. 1992. Ontogeny of taurocholate accumulation in terminal ileal mucosal cells of young chicks. Poultry Science, 71: 367-372. [DOI:10.3382/ps.0710367]
16. Jones, D.B., J.D. Hancock, D.L. Harmon and C.E. Walker. 1992. Effects of exogenous emulsifiers and fat sources on nutrient digestibility, serum lipids, and growth performance in weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 70: 3473-3482. [DOI:10.2527/1992.70113473x]
17. Kim, J.S., J.T. Kwon, L. Harim, J.H. Kim, S.K. Oh, B.K. Lee, L. Zheng, M.S. Konkuk, B.K. Jung and C.W. An. 2012. Performance and carcass characteristics of two different broiler strains by different levels of metabolizable energy. Korean Journal of Poultry Science, 39: 195-205. [DOI:10.5536/KJPS.2012.39.3.195]
18. Lara, L.J.C., N.C. Baiao, C.A.L. Aguilar, S.V. Cançado, M.A. Fiuza and B.R.C. Ribeiro. 2006. Rendimento, composiçao e teor de acidos graxos da carcaça de frangos de corte alimentos com diferentes fontes lipídicas. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 58(1): 108-115. [DOI:10.1590/S0102-09352006000100016]
19. Lechowski, R., W. Bielecki, E. Sawosz, M. Krawiec and W. Klucinski. 1999. The effect of lecithin supplementation on the biochemical profile and morphological changes in the liver of rats fed different animal fats. Veterinary Research Communications, 23: 1-14. [DOI:10.1023/A:1006156104465]
20. Leeson, S. and J.D. Summers. 2001. Scott's nutritional of the chicken. 4th edition. Army Printing Press. Sadr Cantt, 591 pp (In Persian).
21. Lesson, S. and J.O. Atteh. 1995. Utilization of fats and fatty acids by turkey poultry. Poultry Science, 74: 2003-2010. [DOI:10.3382/ps.0742003]
22. Maltas, E., N. Dageri, H. Cingilli Vural and S. Yildiz. 2011. Biochemical and molecular analysis of soybean seed from Turkey. Journal of Medicinal Plant Research, 5: 1575-1581.
23. Manilla, H.A., F. Husveth and K. Nemeth. 1999. Effects of dietary fat origin on the performance of broiler chickens and on the fatty acid composition of selected tissues. Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis, 3(3): 47-57.
24. Marcu, A., I. Vacaru Opriş, A. Marcu, M. Nicula, D. Dronca and B. Kelciov. 2012. Effect of different levels of dietary protein and energy on the growth and slaughter performance at"Hybro PN+ broiler chickens. Animal Science Biotechnology, 45: 424-431.
25. Marcu, A., I. Vacaru Opris, G. Dumitrescu, A. Marcu, C.L. Petculescu, M. Nicul, D. Dronca and B. Kelciov. 2013. Effect of diets with different energy and protein levels on breast muscle characteristics of broiler chickens. Pap Animal Science Biotechnology, 46: 333-340.
26. Milosevic, N., M. Veljic, S.M. Dukic, L. Peric and S. Bjedov. 2013. Effect of lighting program and energy level in the ration on the slaughter traits of broilers. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 29: 607-614. [DOI:10.2298/BAH1304607M]
27. Nimpf, J. and W.J. Schneider. 1991. Recepto-mediated lipoprotein transport in laying hens. Journal of Nutrition, 121: 1471-1474. [DOI:10.1093/jn/121.9.1471]
28. Nir, I., Z. Nitsan and M. Mahagua. 1993. Comparative growth and development of the digestive organs and some enzymes in broiler and egg type chicks after hatching. British Poultry Science, 34: 523-532. [DOI:10.1080/00071669308417607]
29. NRC. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. Ninth Revised Edition. National Academy Press, Washington D.C. Citation key. Datasheets.
30. Nunes, J.O., A.G. Bertechini, J.A.G. de Brito, L. Makiyama, F.R. Mesquita and C.M. Nishio. 2012. Evaluation of cysteamine associated with different energy patterns in diets for broiler chickens. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 41: 1956-1960. [DOI:10.1590/S1516-35982012000800022]
31. Orduna Hernandez, H.M., J. Salinas Chavira, M.F. Montano Gomez, F. Infante Rodríguez, O.M. Manríquez Nunez, M.L. Vazquez Sauceda and R. Yado Puente. 2016. Effect of frying fat substitution by vegetable oil and energy. Concentration on diets for productive performance of broilers. CienciaUAT, 10: 44-51. [DOI:10.29059/cienciauat.v10i2.711]
32. Poorghasemi, M., A. Seidavi and A.A. Qotbi. 2012. Effects of fat source on broiler cecum total bacteria, lactobacillus bacteria, and lactic acid bacteria. Annals of Biological Research, 3(9): 4462-4465.
33. Rosa, P.S., D.E. Faria Filho, F. Dahlke, B.S. Vieira, M. Macari and R.L. Furlan. 2007. Effect of energy intake on performance and carcass composition of broiler chickens from two different genetic groups. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 9: 117-122. [DOI:10.1590/S1516-635X2007000200007]
34. Ross, E. and W. Dominy.1985. The effect of dehydrated Spirulina platensis on poultry. Poultry Science, 64(1): 173.
35. Roy, A., S. Haldar, S. Mondal and T.K. Ghosh. 2010. Effects of supplemental exogenous emulsifier on performance, nutrient metabolism, and serum lipid profile in broiler chickens. Journal of Vetinary Medicine International, doi: 10.4061/2010/262604. [DOI:10.4061/2010/262604]
36. Sallam, K.I. 2007. Antimicrobial and antioxidant effects of sodium acetate, sodium lactate, and sodium citrate in refrigerated sliced salmon. Food Control, 18(5): 566-575. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.02.002]
37. SAS Institute. 2008. SAS User's Guide Statics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC., USA.
38. Tancharoenrat, P., V. Ravindran, F. Zaefarian and G. Ravindran. 2013. Influence of age on the apparent metabolisable energy and total tract apparent fat digestibility of different fat sources for broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 186(3): 186-192. [DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.013]
39. Tancharoenrat, P. and V. Ravindran. 2014. Influence of tallow and calcium concentrations on the performance and energy and nutrient utilization in broiler starters. Poultry Science, 93: 1453-1462. [DOI:10.3382/ps.2013-03817]
40. Tooci, S., M. Shivazad, N. Eila and A. Zarei. 2009. Effect of dietary dilution of energy and nutrients during different growing periods on compensatory growth of Ross broilers. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(22): 6470-6475. [DOI:10.5897/AJB09.774]
41. Ullah, M.S., T.N. Pasha, Z. Ali, F.M. Saima Khattak and Z. Hayat. 2012. Effects of different pre-starter diets on broiler performance, gastro intestinal tract morphometry and carcass yield. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 22: 570-575.
42. Vieira, S.L., A.M.L. Ribeiro, A.M. Kessler, L.M. Fernandes, A.R. Ebert and G. Eichner. 2002. Utilização da energia de dietas para frangos de corte formuladas com óleo ácido de soja. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 4(2): 1-13. [DOI:10.1590/S1516-635X2002000200005]
43. Viennois, E. and B. Chassaing. 2018. First victim, later aggressor: How the intestinal microbiota drives the pro-inflammatory effects of dietary emulsifiers? Gut microbes, 9(3): 1-4. [DOI:10.1080/19490976.2017.1421885]
44. Waldroup, P.W., N.M. Tidwell and A.L. Izat. 1990. The effects of energy and amino acid levels on performance and carcass quality of male and female broilers grown separately. Poultry Science, 69: 1513-1521. [DOI:10.3382/ps.0691513]
45. Wang, X., E.D. Peebles and W. Zhai. 2014. Effects of protein source and nutrient density in the diets of male broilers from 8 to 21 days of age on their subsequent growth, blood constituents, and carcass compositions. Poultry Science, 93: 463-1474. [DOI:10.3382/ps.2013-03838]
46. Wijendran, V. and K.C. Hayes. 2004. Dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acid balance and cardiovascular health. Annual Review of Nutrition, 24(1): 597-615. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132106]
47. Wiseman, J., D.J.A. Cole, F.G. Perry, B.G. Vernon and B.C. Cooke. 1986. Apparent metabolizable energy values for fats for broiler chicks. British Journal of Poultry Science, 27: 1143-1144. [DOI:10.1080/00071668608416915]
48. Xing, J.J., E. Van Heugten, D.F. Li, K.J. Touchette, J.A. Coalson, R.L. Odgaard and J. Odle. 2004. Effects of emulsification, fat encapsulation, and pelleting on weanling pig performance and nutrient digestibility. Journal of Animal Science, 82: 2601-2609. [DOI:10.2527/2004.8292601x]
49. Zhao, L.H., Q.G. Ma, X.D. Chen and X.X. Hu. 2008. Effects of dietary energy levels and lysine levels on performance and carcass characteristics in Arbor Acres Broilers. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 44: 35-40.
50. Zollistsch, W., W. Kraus, F. Aichinger and F. Lettrer. 1997. Effects of different dietary fat sources on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 66: 63-73. [DOI:10.1016/S0377-8401(96)01126-1]
51. Zosangpuii, A., A.K. Patra and G. Samanta. 2015. Inclusion of an emulsifier to the diets containing different sources of fats on performances of Khaki Campbell ducks. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, Shiraz University, 16(2): 156-160.
52. Zhang, B., L. Haitao, D. Zhao, Y. Guo and A. Barri. 2011. Effect of fat type and lysophosphatidylcholine addition to broiler diets on performance, apparent digestibility of fatty acids, and apparent metabolizable energy content. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 163: 177-184. [DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.10.004]
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
