Volume 9, Issue 19 (6-2018)                   Res Anim Prod 2018, 9(19): 39-47 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohammadi-Mehr A, Ghasemi E, Khorvash M. (2018). EEffect of Partial Replacement of Alfalfa Hay with Wheat Straw on Digestibility and Growth Performance of Fattening Male Lambs. Res Anim Prod. 9(19), 39-47. doi:10.29252/rap.9.19.39
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-796-en.html
1- Isfahan University of Technology
Abstract:   (5101 Views)
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of partially replacing forage sources (alfalfa hay) with treated wheat straw on nutrient digestibility, chewing activity, blood metabolites, rumen fermentation, and performance of finishing lambs. Wheat straw (WS) was treated with 7 % sodium hydroxide, 3.5 % salt, and 3.3 % calcium carbonate and then ensiled for 2 months. Twenty-three male lambs (28 kg) were randomly allocated to three diets differing in forage sources: 1) control diet (100 % alfalfa hay), 2) 1/3 WS (67 % alfalfa hay and 33 % wheat straw) and 3) 2/3 WS (33 % alfalfa hay and 67 % wheat straw). Results indicated that ruminal degradability (24 and 48 h incubation) of treated wheat straw and alfalfa hay was similar, but higher than untreated straw (P<0.01). Dry matter intake and chewing time decreased linearly (P= 0.01), but no change in chewing time/DMI was observed with increasing WS levels in the diet. Feeding the diets containing WS improved fiber digestibility (P<0.01), tended to decrease ruminal pH (P=0.08, quadratic effect), and increased ruminal ammonia-N (P=0.04), molar acetate proportion (P=0.05), and total volatile fatty acids concentration (P=0.02, quadratic effect). Moreover, average daily gain (P=0.02) and feed efficiency (P=0.08) was enhanced quadratically with increasing levels of WS in the diet. Carcass weight, blood metabolites and molar proportions of propionate and butyrate were not affected by the dietary treatments. Overall, the results indicated that partially replacing alfalfa hay with wheat straw had no adverse impacts on the performance of finishing lambs, but feeding 1/3 WS increased fiber digestibility, daily gain and feed efficiency.
 
Full-Text [PDF 1355 kb]   (5589 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: تغذیه نشخوارکنندگان
Received: 2017/10/25 | Accepted: 2018/01/10

References
1. Afshar, S., M. Kazemi-Bonchenari and H.R. Ferdowsi. 2015. Effect of feeding whole or cracked barley grain accompanied by soybean meal or urea on nutrients digestibility and parameters of rumen in mehraban sheep. Research on Animal Production, 6: 102-107.
2. Allen, M.S. 2000. Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 83: 1598-1624. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75030-2]
4. Anonymous. 2015. Iran Agriculture Statistics, 1394. Ministry of jihad-e-agriculture. Available from (in Persian): http://www.maj.ir/dorsapax/userfiles/file/Amarnameh1008.pdf.
5. AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis (17th ed). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.
6. Blanco, C., R. Bodas, N. Prieto, S. Andrés, S. López and F.J. Giráldez. 2014. Concentrate plus ground barley straw pellets can replace conventional feeding systems for light fattening lambs. Small Ruminant Research, 116: 137-143. [DOI:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.11.008]
8. Chandrasekharaiah, M., K.T. Sampath, C. Prakash and U.S. Praveen. 2002. Effect of supplementation of different concentrate ingredients on in vitro NDF digestibility of finger millet straw. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 2: 169-176.
9. Ghasemi, E., M. Khorvash, G.R. Ghorbani, M.R. Emami and K. Karimi. 2013. Dry chemical processing and ensiling of rice straw to improve its quality for use as ruminant feed. Tropical animal health and production, 45: 1215-1221. [DOI:10.1007/s11250-012-0349-0]
11. Ghasemi, E., M. Khorvash, G.R. Ghorbani, F. Hashemzadeh, M. Saebi-Far, A. Kahyani and M. Kazemi-Bonchenari. 2014. Interaction effects of degradable nitrogen sources and straw treatment on rumen parameters and microbial protein synthesis in sheep. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 84: 1011-1015.
12. Ghasemi, E., G.R. Ghorbani, M. Khorvash and M.R. Emami. 2014. Adjustment of pH and enzymatic treatment of barley straw by dry processing method. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 42: 400-405. [DOI:10.1080/09712119.2013.875908]
14. Ghasemi, E., M.M. Hajmahmoodi and M. Khorvash. 2017. Effect of substituting alfalfa hay with forage and non-forage fiber sources based on undigested neutral detergent fiber on performance of high-producing lactating cows. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, under review (Unpublished).
15. Golchin-Gelehdooni, S., A. Teimori-Yanesari and A. Farhadi. 2011. The effects of acid treatment and particle size on degradability parameters of canola meal and alfalfa hay in rumen. Research on Animal Production, 2: 36-48.
16. Haddad, S.G., K.Z. Mahmoud and H.A. Talfaha. 2005. Effect of varying levels of dietary undegradable protein on nutrient intake, digestibility and growth performance of Awassi lambs fed on high wheat straw diets. Small Ruminant Research, 58: 231-236. [DOI:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.10.005]
18. Haddad, S.G. and M.Q. Husein. 2001. Nutritive value of lentil and vetch straws as compared with alfalfa hay and wheat straw for replacement ewe lambs. Small Ruminant Research, 40: 255-260. [DOI:10.1016/S0921-4488(01)00176-6]
20. Iwaniuk, M.E. and R.A. Erdman. 2015. Intake, milk production, ruminal, and feed efficiency responses to dietary cation-anion difference by lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 98: 8973-8985. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2015-9949]
22. Jalali, A.R., P. Nørgaard, M.R. Weisbjerg and M.O. Nielsen. 2012. Effect of forage quality on intake, chewing activity, faecal particle size distribution, and digestibility of neutral detergent fibre in sheep, goats, and llamas. Small ruminant research, 103:143-151. [DOI:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.09.004]
24. Kemper, N., A. Flanders, B. Watkins and M. Popp. 2013. Impact of the 2012 Drought on Field Crops and Cattle Production in Arkansas Preliminary Report, Drought Impact, 1-10.
25. Kumari, N.N., Y.R. Reddy, M. Blummel, D. Nagalakshmi, T. Monika, B.V.S. Reddy and C.R. Reddy. 2013. Growth performance and carcass characteristics of growing ram lambs fed sweet sorghum bagasse-based complete rations varying in roughage-to-concentrate ratios. Tropical animal health and production, 45: 649-655. [DOI:10.1007/s11250-012-0272-4]
27. Mackie, R.I. and F.M. Gilchrist. 1979. Changes in lactate-producing and lactate-utilizing bacteria in relation to pH in the rumen of sheep during stepwise adaptation to a high-concentrate diet. Applied and environmental microbiology, 38: 422-430.
28. McDonald, I.W. 1952. The role of ammonia in ruminal digestion of protein. Biochemical Journal, 51: 86 pp. [DOI:10.1042/bj0510086]
30. Mafri, G.O. and T. Branch. 2013. Guidelines for estimating wheat straw biomass production costs: average crop residue zone. Manitoba.ca/agriculture. management/pubs/wheatstraw_Biomass, 1-8.
31. McLeod, K.R. and R.L. Baldwin. 2000. Effects of diet forage: concentrate ratio and metabolizable energy intake on visceral organ growth and in vitro oxidative capacity of gut tissues in sheep. Journal of Animal Science, 78: 760-770. [DOI:10.2527/2000.783760x]
33. National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th rev. ed. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.
34. National Research Council (NRC). 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids and new world camelids, 6th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
35. Oba, M. and M.S. Allen. 1999. Evaluation of the importance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage: effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 82: 589-596. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75271-9]
37. Omidi-Mirzaee, H., E. Ghasemi, G.R. Ghorbani and M. Khorvash. 2017. Chewing activity, metabolic profile and performance of high- producing dairy cows fed conventional forages, wheat straw or rice straw. South African Journal of Animal Science, 47: 342-351.
38. Papi, N., A. Mostafa-Tehrani, H. Amanlou and M. Memarian. 2011. Effects of dietary forage-to-concentrate ratios on performance and carcass characteristics of growing fat-tailed lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 163: 93-98. [DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.10.010]
40. Rai, S.N. and V.D. Mudgal. 1996. Effect of alkali and (or) steam treatment of wheat straw or cellulase augmented concentrate mixture on rumen fermentation in goats. Small Ruminant Research, 19: 219-225. [DOI:10.1016/0921-4488(95)00759-8]
42. Rohweder, D.A., R.F. Barnes and N. Jorgensen. 1978. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science, 47: 747-759. [DOI:10.2527/jas1978.473747x]
44. Sahoo, B., M.L. Saraswat, N. Haque and M.Y. Khan. 2002. Influence of chemical treatment of wheat straw on carbon-nitrogen and energy balance in sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 44: 201-206. [DOI:10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00043-3]
46. Van Keulen, V. and B.H. Young. 1977. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science, 26: 119-135.
47. Van Soest, P.J., J.B. Robertson and B.A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583-3597. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2]
49. Yuangklang, C., J.T. Schonewille, A. Alhaidary, K. Vasupen, S. Bureenok, B. Seanmahayak, S. Wongsuthavas and A.C. Beynen. 2017. Growth performance and macronutrient digestion in goats fed a rice straw based ration supplemented with fibrolytic enzymes. Small Ruminant Research, 154: 20-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.06.009]
51. Zhang, H.L., Y. Chen, X.L. Xu and Y.X. Yang. 2013. Effects of branched-chain amino acids on in vitro ruminal fermentation of wheat straw. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 26: 523-528. [DOI:10.5713/ajas.2012.12539]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research On Animal Production

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb