Volume 8, Issue 15 (6-2017)
Res Anim Prod 2017, 8(15): 49-57 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
(2017).
Effects of COMBO® Enzyme Supplemented Wheat and Wheat Bran Diet on Growth Performance and Digesta Physicochemical Properties of Broilers
. Res Anim Prod. 8(15), 49-57. doi:10.29252/rap.8.15.49
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-753-en.html
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-753-en.html
Abstract: (4760 Views)
An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of wheat and wheat bran diets with and without enzymes on growth performance and digestive characteristics of broilers. A total number of 625 one day old Ross-308 broiler chickens were allocated randomly to 5 treatments with 5 replicates, using a CRD statistical design. Treatments were control, wheat, wheat+ enzyme and wheat bran and wheat bran+ enzyme. Traits were growth performance, carcass characteristics, ileal microbial counting and measurement of gut acidity and viscosity. According to the results, effect of different treatments on all experimental traits at starter and finisher periods were significant (P<0.01). Minimum growth performance and maximum feed conversion rate at the whole rearing period belonged to treatments without enzymes. Supplementation of wheat and wheat bran with enzymes resulted in significant improvement of growth performance traits compare to control group (P<0.01). Effects of different treatments on carcass characteristics were significant (P<0.01). The highest carcass performances belonged to control group, but supplementation of wheat and wheat bran with enzymes resulted in significant improvement of carcass performances (P<0.01). Effects of different treatments on the intestinal microbial population were significant (P<0.01). Maximum undesirable bacteria were observed in treatments without enzymes, but maximum desirable bacteria were observed in treatments supplemented with enzymes. Digesta acidity and viscosity were lower and higher in the treatments without enzymes respectively (P<0.01). Supplementation of wheat and wheat bran with enzymes improved these digestive properties (P<0.01). In conclusion, inclusion of wheat and wheat bran in broiler corn-soy based diets were conceivable and supplementation of wheat and wheat bran diets improved the growth and carcass performances.
Keywords: Broilers, Carcass Characteristics, Growth Performance, Microbial Population, Wheat and Wheat Bran
References
1. AOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis, 18th edn. Association Of Analytical Chemists International, Gaithersburg, MD, U.S.A.
2. Austic, R.E. 1985. Implication of acid-base balance in the production of poultry. Proceeding of Arkansas nutrition conference, USA, 16-28 pp.
3. Austin, S.C., J. Wiseman and A. Chesson.1999. Influence of Non-Starch polysaccharides structure on the metabolizable energy of UK wheat fed to poultry. Journal of Cereal Science, 29: 77-88. [DOI:10.1006/jcrs.1998.0213]
4. Barges, S.A., J.P. De Oliveria, A.V.F. Da Silva and T.T. Dossantos. 2011. Use of electrolytes for birds-the practice of theory. Preceding of Australian poultry science symposium, 14-16th Feb 2011, 170-183 pp.
5. Bedford, M.R. and H. Schulze. 1998. Exogenous enzymes of pigs and poultry. Journal of Nutrition Research. A review, 11: 91-114. [DOI:10.1079/NRR19980007]
6. Bedford, M.R. 2003. New enzyme technologies for poultry feeds. British Poultry Science, 44: 14-16. [DOI:10.1080/713655277]
7. Cambell, G.L. and M.R. Bedford. 1992. Enzyme applications for monogastric feeds: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 72: 449-466. [DOI:10.4141/cjas92-058]
8. Choct, M. and G. Annison. 1992a. The inhibition of nutrient digestion by wheat pentosans. British Journal of Nutrition, 67: 123-132. [DOI:10.1079/BJN19920014]
9. Choct, M. and G. Annison. 1992b. Aniti-Nutritive activity of wheat arabinoxylans: role of viscosity. British Poultry Science, 33: 821-834. [DOI:10.1080/00071669208417524]
10. Christensen, H.R., H. Frokiaer and J.J. Pestka. 2002. Lactobacilli Differentially Modulate Expression of Cytokines and Maturation Surface Markers in Murine Dendritic Cells. Journal of Immunology, 168: 171-178. [DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.168.1.171]
11. Cowan, W.D. and T. Hastrupt. 1995. Application of Xylanases and β-Glucanases to the Feed of Turkeys and Ducks. In: Proceeding of 10th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Turkey, Antalya, 15-19th Oct 1995, 320-321pp.
12. Daymeh, S., N. Afzali and M. Bashtini. 2016. Effect of revabio in diets containing wheat bran on growth performance, some blood metabolites and absorbing of mineral elements in broilers chickens. Research on animal production 7: 33-43 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/rap.7.14.43]
13. Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple ranges and multiple F test. Biometrics, 11: 1-42. [DOI:10.2307/3001478]
14. Finnie, S.M., A.D. Bettge and C.F. Morris. 2006. Influence of cultivar and environment on water-soluble and water-insoluble arabinoxylans in soft wheat. Journal of Cereal Chemistry, 83: 617-623. [DOI:10.1094/CC-83-0617]
15. Garcia, M., R. Lazaro, M.A. Latorre, M.I. Gracia and G.G. Mateos. 2008. Influence of enzyme supplementation and heat processing of barley on digestive traits and productive performance of broilers. Poultry Science, 87: 940-948. [DOI:10.3382/ps.2007-00266]
16. Ghorbani, M.R., J. Fayazi and M. Chaji. 2009. Effect of dietary phytase and nsp-degrading enzymes in diets containing rape seed meal on broiler performance and carass characteristics. Research Journal of Biological Science, 4: 258-264. [DOI:10.1017/S1752756200030763]
17. Graham, H., M. Bedford and M. Choct. 1993. High gut digesta viscosity can reduce performance. Journal of Feedstuff, 65: 1-4.
18. Hubener, K., W. Vahjen and O. Simon. 2002. Bacterial responses to different dietary cereal types and xylanase supplementation in the intestine of broiler chicken. Archive of Animal Nitrition, 65: 167-187. [DOI:10.1080/00039420214191]
19. Kalantar, M., J. Salary, M. Nouri Sanami, M. Khojastekey and H.R. Hemati Matin. 2014. Dietary supplementation of silybum marinum or curcuma spp on health characteristics and broiler chicken performance. Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research, 2: 58-63.
20. Khajali, F., M. Tahmasebi, H. Hassanpour, M.R. Akbari, D. Qujeq and R.F. Wideman. 2001. Effects of supplementation of canola meal based diets with arginine on performance, plasma nitric oxide and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens growth at high altitude. Poultry Science, 90: 2287-2294. [DOI:10.3382/ps.2011-01618]
21. Langhout, D.J., J.B. Schutte, P. Van Leeuwen, J. Wiebenga and S. Tamminga. 1999. Effect of dietary high and low-methylated citrus pectin on the activity of the ileal micro flora and morphology of the small intestinal wall of broiler chicks. British Poultry Science, 40: 340-347. [DOI:10.1080/00071669987421]
22. Malekzadeh, M. and M.D. Shakouri. 2016. The effect of four barley cultivars in whole and ground forms on performance, nutrients digestibility and blood lipid parameters of broiler chickens. Research on Animal Production, 7: 40-48 (In Persian). [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.rap.7.13.48]
23. Morakami, A.E., H.R. Franco, E.N. Martins, O. Rondon, M.I. Sakamato and M.S. Pereira. 2003. Effect of Electrolyte Balance in Low-Protein Diets on Broiler Performance and Tibial Dyschonroplasia Incidence. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 12: 207-216. [DOI:10.1093/japr/12.2.207]
24. Momtazan, R., H. Moravej, M. Zaghari and H.R. Taheri. 2011. A note on the effects of a combination of an enzyme complex and probiotic in the diet on performance of broiler chickens. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 50: 249-254.
25. Nadeem, M.A., M.I. Anjum, A.G. Khan and A. Azin. 2005. Effect of dietary supplementation of non-starch polysaccharide degrading enzymes on growth performance of broiler chicks. Journal of Pakistan Veterinary, 25: 183-188.
26. Rama-Rao, S.V., M.V.L.N. Rajie, M.R. Reddy and A.K. Panda. 2004. Replacement of yellow maize with pear millet, foxtail millet or finger millet in broiler chicken diets containing supplemental enzymes. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 17: 836-842. [DOI:10.5713/ajas.2004.836]
27. Ravindran, V., P.H. Selle and W.L. Bryden. 1999. Effects of phytase supplementation, individually and in combination, with glycanase, on the nutritive value of wheat and barley. Poultry Science, 78: 1588-1595. [DOI:10.1093/ps/78.11.1588]
28. Rhee, K.J., P.J. Jasper, P. Sethupathi, N. Shanmugam, D. Lanning and K.L. Knight. 2005. Positive selection of the peripheral b-cell repertoire in gut-associated lymphoid tissues. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 201: 55-62. [DOI:10.1084/jem.20041849]
29. Rousseau, X., M.P. Letourneau-Montminy, M. Meme, M. Magnin, Y. Nys and A. Narcy. 2012. Phosphorous Utilization in Finishing Broiler Chickens: Effects of Dietary Calcium and Microbial Phytase. Poultry Science, 91: 2820-2837. [DOI:10.3382/ps.2012-02350]
30. Saki, A.A., H.R. Hemati Matin, M.M. Tabatabai, P. Zamani and R. Naseri Harsini. 2010. Microflora population, intestinal condition and performance of broilers in response to various rates of pectin and cellulose in the diet. European Poultry Science, 74: 183-188.
31. SAS Institute. 2004. SAS Procedure Guide for Personal Computers, STAT User Guide, Statistics. Version 9.1., SAS Institute INC, Cary NC.
32. Selle, P.H., K.H. Huang and W.I. Muir. 2003. Effects of nutreient specifications and xylanase plus phytase supplementation of wheat based diets on growth performance and carcass traits of broilerchicks. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 16:1501-1509. [DOI:10.5713/ajas.2003.1501]
33. Selle, P.H. and V. Ravindran. 2007. Microbial phytase in poultry nutrition. Journal of Animal Feed Science and Technology, 135: 1-41. [DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.06.010]
34. Shakouri, M.D., H. Kermanshahi and M. Mohsenzadeh. 2006. Effect of different nsps in semi purified diets on performance and intestinal microflora of young broiler chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 5: 557-561. [DOI:10.3923/ijps.2006.557.561]
35. Slominski, B.A. 2011. Recent advances in research on enzymes for poultry diets. Review: Poultry Science, 90: 2013-2023. [DOI:10.3382/ps.2011-01372]
36. Smits, C.H.M., A. Veldman, M.W.A. Verstegen and A.C. Beynen. 1997. Dietary carboxymethylcellulose with high instead of low viscosity reduces macronutrient digestion in broiler chickens. Journal of Nutrition, 127: 483-487. [DOI:10.1093/jn/127.3.483]
37. Thiabault, J.F., M. Lahaye and F. Guillon. 1993. Physicochemical properties of food plant cell walls. In: dietary fiber-a component of food: nutritional function in health and disease. Schweizer, t.f. and edwards, c.a. ed. springer-verlag press Journal of Agriculture, New York. 21-56 pp [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4471-1928-9_2]
38. Weber, C.W., E.A. Kohlhepp, A. Idouraine and L.J. Ochoa. 1993. The binding capacity of eighteen fiber sources for calcium. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 41: 193-1935. [DOI:10.1021/jf00035a023]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
