Volume 9, Issue 19 (6-2018)                   Res Anim Prod 2018, 9(19): 71-75 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Varkoohi S, Khosravi S, Forotanifar S, Sayadnejad M B. (2018). Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Some Reproductive Disorders and Its Relationship with Production Traits in Iranian Holstein Cows. Res Anim Prod. 9(19), 71-75. doi:10.29252/rap.9.19.71
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-651-en.html
1- Razi university
2- Animal Breeding center of Iran
Abstract:   (4083 Views)

     In this study, estimation of genetic parameters were performed for some reproductive disorders (retained placenta, repetitious abortion and infertility) and genetic and phenotypic correlations between these traits with milk, fat and protein yield.  The obtained data were collected from 63403 Holstein cows on Animal Breeding Center of Iran (from 2001 to 2013). After editing the data, estimation of genetic parameters for traits was performed by univariate animal and Threshold models. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic correlations among mentioned traits and production traits were performed by bivariate animal model via using the ASREML Software. Results showed that heritability for retained placenta, repetitious abortion and infertility traits by animal model were 0.00012, 0.0085 and 0.051, respectively, on the other hand by using threshold model, there was not a reasonable estimation. Genetic correlations between retained placenta and persistency of milk, fat and protein yield were 0.4, 0.32 and 0.38, respectively; with repetitious abortion were 0.14, 0.25 and 0.1; and with infertility were 0.01, 0.09 and 0.02, respectively the phenotypic correlations among these reproductive disorder traits and production traits were relatively low.

Full-Text [PDF 665 kb]   (1574 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: ژنتیک و اصلاح نژاد دام
Received: 2016/08/9 | Accepted: 2017/10/4

References
1. Campos, M.S., C.J. Wilcox. C. Becerril and A. Diz. 1994. Genetic parameters for yield and reproductive traits of Holstein and Jersey cattle in Florida. Journal of Dairy Science, 7: 867-873. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77021-1]
2. Cole, J.B., K.L. Parker Gaddis, J.S. Clay and C. Maltecca. 2012. Genomic evolution of health trait in dairy cattle. USDA press, Washington DC, United states.
3. Ebrahimpourtaher, S., G. Moghaddam and J. Shoja. 2015. Estimation of genetic parameters for production traits and some reproduction. Animal Science Research, 25: 2-9.
4. Gilmour, A.R., B.J. Gogel, B.R. Cullis and R. Thompson. 2009. ASREML. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange, Australia,
5. Harder, B., J. Bennewitz, D. Hinrichs and E. Kalm. 2006. Genetic parameters for health traits and their relationship to different persistency traits in German Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 89: 3202-3212. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72595-4]
6. Heringstad, B., Y.M. Chang, D. Gianola and G. Klemetsdal. 2005. Genetic analysis of clinical mastitis, milk fever, ketosis, and retained placenta in three lactations of Norwegian red cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 88: 3273-3281. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73010-1]
7. Hoekstra, J.A., W. Van der Lugt, J.H.J. Van der Werf and W. Ouweltjes. 1994. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for milk production and fertility traits in upgraded dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science, 40: 225-232. [DOI:10.1016/0301-6226(94)90090-6]
8. Kadarmideen, H.N., R. Thompson and G. Simm. 2000. Linear and threshold model genetic parameters for disease, fertility and milk production in dairy cattle. Animal Science, 71: 411-419. [DOI:10.1017/S1357729800055338]
9. Meinert, T.R., S. Korver and J.A.M. Van Arendonk. 1989. Parameter estimation of milk yield and composition for 305 days and peak production. Journal of Dairy Science, 72: 1534-1539. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79264-X]
10. Moore, R.K., B.W. Kennedy, L.R. Schaeffer and J.E. Moxley. 1992. Relationships between age and body weight at calving, feed intake, production, days open, and selection indexes in Ayrshires and Holsteins. Journal of dairy science, 75: 294-306. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77765-0]
11. Smith, C. 1998. Introduction: Current animal breeding. In: Clark, A. J. (Eds.) Animal breeding technology for the 21st Century. Harwood Academic Press, New Delhi, India, pp: 1-10.
12. Uribe, H.A., B.W. Kennedy, S. Martin and D.F. Kelton. 1995. Genetic parameters for common health disorders of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 78: 421-430. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76651-6]
13. Van Drop, T.E., J.C.M. Dickers, S.W. Martin and J.P.T.M Noodhuizen. 1998. Genetic parameters of health disorders, and relationships with 305-day milk yield and conformation traits of registered Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 81: 2264-2270. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75806-0]
14. Van Vleck, L., M. Dale, C. Dong and G.R. Wiggans. 1988. Genetic (co) variances for milk and fat yield in California, New York, and Wisconsin for an animal model by restricted maximum likelihood. Journal of Dairy Science, 71: 3053-3060. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79905-1]
15. Varkoohi, S., M. Shilanan, S. Forutanifar and A. Eghbal. 2015. Investigation of culling reasons on Holstein cows in Iran. Applied Animal Science Research Journal, 14: 93-100.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research On Animal Production

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb