دوره 8، شماره 16 - ( تابستان 1396 )                   جلد 8 شماره 16 صفحات 55-62 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Effect of Apple Vinegar Addition to the Drinking Water on Growth Performance, Ileal Lactobacillus Population, Digestive Chyme pH and Immune Response of Broiler Chickens. rap. 2017; 8 (16) :55-62
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-804-fa.html
اله دو پرویز، زرقی حیدر، کرمانشاهی حسن، عدالتیان محمدرضا. اثر افزودن سرکه سیب به آب مصرفی بر عملکرد رشد، pH محتویات گوارشی، جمعیت لاکتوباسیلوس ایلئوم و پاسخ ایمنی جوجه‌های گوشتی . پژوهشهاي توليدات دامي. 1396; 8 (16) :55-62

URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-804-fa.html


چکیده:   (1223 مشاهده)
به­ منظور بررسی اثر افزودن سرکه سیب به آب مصرفی بر عملکرد رشد، سیستم ایمنی، pH محتویات دستگاه گوارش و جمعیت لاکتوباسیلوس ایلئوم جوجه­ های گوشتی این آزمایش انجام شد. آزمایش با استفاده از 165 قطعه جوجه خروس گوشتی یک روزه سویه راس 308، در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با 3 تیمار (افزودن سطوح صفر، 1 و 2 درصد سرکه سیب به آب مصرفی)، 5 تکرار و 11 قطعه پرنده در هر تکرار در دامنه سنی 42-1 روزگی انجام شد. افزودن سرکه سیب به میزان 1 درصد به آب مصرفی باعث کاهش معنی­دار مصرف خوراک و ضریب تبدیل غذایی (05/0P<) جوجه­ های گوشتی در دوره ­های سنی 10-1 و 24-11 روزگی شد. ایمنی سلولی ایجاد شده در پاسخ به تزریق فیتوهموآگلوتینین (PHA-P) در سن 42 روزگی در پرندگان دریافت کننده آب حاوی سرکه سیب (1 و 2 درصد) در مقایسه با پرندگان دریافت کننده آب فاقد افزودنی به طور معنی ­دار بیشتر بود (05/0P<). افزودن سطوح مختلف سرکه سیب به آب مصرفی تأثیر معنی­ داری بر جمعیت لاکتوباسیلوس ایلئوم و pH محتویات چینه­ دان، سنگدان و ایلئوم در سن 10 روزگی نداشت. افزودن سطوح مختلف سرکه سیب به آب مصرفی تاثیر معنی­ داری بر وزن نسبی اندام­ های لنفوئیدی در سن 42 روزگی و تیتر آنتی بادی در پاسخ به تزریق گلبول­های قرمز گوسفند نداشت (05/0P>). نتایج این آزمایش نشان داد که افزودن سرکه سیب به آب مصرفی باعث بهبود عملکرد رشد جوجه ­های گوشتی شد. همچنین مصرف سرکه سیب در سنین پایین اثر بخش­تر بود.
متن کامل [PDF 363 kb]   (7748 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: تخصصي
دریافت: ۱۳۹۶/۸/۸ | ویرایش نهایی: ۱۳۹۶/۸/۹ | پذیرش: ۱۳۹۶/۸/۸ | انتشار: ۱۳۹۶/۸/۸

فهرست منابع
1. Abdel-Azeem, F., Y.M. El-Hommosany and G.M. Nematallah. 2000. Effect of citric acid in diets with different starch and fiber levels on productive performance and some physiological traits of growing rabbits. Egypt Journal Rabbit Science, 10: 121-145.
2. Abdel-Fattah, S.A., M.H. El-Sanhoury, N.M. El-Mednay and F. Abdel-Azeem. 2008. Thyroid activity, some blood constituents, organs morphology and performance of broiler chicks fed supplemental organic acids. International Journal of Poultry Science, 7: 215-222. [DOI:10.3923/ijps.2008.215.222]
3. Abdo, M. and A. Zeinb. 2004. Efficacy of acetic acid in improving the utilization of low protein-low energy broiler diets. Egypt Poultry Science, 24: 123-141.
4. Abedini, M., F. Shariatmadari and M. karimi. 2011. Comparison of the effects of medicinal plants, organic acids and antibiotics in diets containing barley and enzyme on performance, Blood, immune response and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Production, 13:19-27 (In Persian).
5. Akbari, M.R., H. Kermanshahi and G.A. Kalidari. 2004. Effect of acetic acid administration in drinking water on performance and growth characteristics and ileal microflora of broiler chickens. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 3: 139-147 (In Persian).
6. Alp, M., M. Kocabagli, R. kahraman and K. Bostan. 1999. Effect of dietary supplementation with organic acids and zinc bacitracin on ileal microflora, pH and performance in broilers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 23: 451-455.
7. Aviagen. 2015. Ross 308: Broiler nutrition specification. In: H. Aviagen Inc., AL, (ed.), USA.
8. Beshratian, M. 2011. The effect of the leaves and extract of Aloe-vera powder on growth performance, blood parameters and the immune system of broiler chickens. MSc. Thesis, 30-35pp, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (In Persian).
9. Bolton, W. and W.A. Dewar. 1965. The digestibility of acetic, propionic and butyric acids by the fowl. British Poultry Science, 6: 103-105. [DOI:10.1080/00071666508415562]
10. Brenes, A., A. Viveros, I. Arija, C. Centeno, M. Pizarro and C. Bravo. 2003. The effect of citric acid and microbial phytase on mineral utilization in broiler chicks. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 110: 201-219. [DOI:10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00207-4]
11. Brisbin, J.T., H. Zhou, J. Gong, P. Sabour, M.R. Akbari, H.R. Haghighi and S. Sharif. 2008. Gene expression profiling of chicken lymphoid cells after treatment with Lactobacillus acidophilus cellular components. Developmental and Comparative Immunology, 32: 563-574. [DOI:10.1016/j.dci.2007.09.003]
12. Chaveerach, P., D.A. Keuzenkamp, L.J.A. Lipman and F. Van Knapen. 2004. Effect of organic acids in drinking water for young broilers on Campylobacter infection, volatile fatty acid production, gut microflora and histological cell changes. Poultry Science, 83: 330-334. [DOI:10.1093/ps/83.3.330]
13. Cheema, M.A., M.A. Qureshi and G.B. Havenstein. 2003. A comparison of the immune response of a 2001 commercial broiler with a 1957 random bred broiler strain when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poultry Science, 82: 1519-1529. [DOI:10.1093/ps/82.10.1519]
14. Chowdhury, R., K.M.S. Islam, M.J. Khan, M.R. Karim, M.N. Haque and M. Khatun. 2009. Effect of citric acid, avilamycin and their combination on the performance, tibia ash and immune status of broilers. Poultry Science, 8: 1616-1622. [DOI:10.3382/ps.2009-00119]
15. Denli, M., F. Okan and K. Celik. 2003. Effect of dietary probiotic, organic acid and antibiotic supplementation to diets on broiler performance and carcass yield. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 2: 89-91. [DOI:10.3923/pjn.2003.89.91]
16. Ebrahimi, E., S. Sobhani Rad, and H. Zarghi. 2017. Effect of triticale level and exogenous enzyme in the grower diet on performance, gastrointestinal tract relative weight, jejunal morphology and blood lipids of japanese quail (coturnix coturnix japonica). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 19: 569-580.
17. Garcia, V., P. Catala Gregori, F. Hernandez, M.D. Megias and J. Madrid. 2007. Effect of formic acid and plant extracts on growth, nutrient digestibility, intestine mucosa morphology and meat yield of broilers. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 16: 555-562. [DOI:10.3382/japr.2006-00116]
18. Grasman, K.A. 2010. In vivo functional tests for assessing immunotoxicity in birds. Methods Mol Biol, 598: 387-398. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-60761-401-2_25]
19. Gutierezz Del Alamo, A., J. De Los Mozos, J.T.P. Van Dam and P.P. De Ayala. 2007. The use of short and medium chain fatty acids as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoters in broilers infected with malabsorption syndrome. In Proceedings of the 16th, European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, pp: 317-320.
20. Haque, M.N., K.M. Islam, M.A. Akbar, R. Chowdhury, M. Khatun, M.R. Karim and B.W. Kemppainen. 2010. Effect of dietary citric acid, flavomycin and their combination on the performance, tibia ash and immune status of broiler. Canadian journal of animal science, 90: 57-63. [DOI:10.4141/CJAS09048]
21. Hassan, A.M., H.M. Abdel Azeem and P.G. Reddy. 2009. Effect of some water supplements on the performance and immune system of chronically heat-stressed broiler chicks. International Journal of Poultry Science, 8: 432-436. [DOI:10.3923/ijps.2009.432.436]
22. Hernández, F., V. García, J. Madrid, J. Orengo, P. Catalá and M.D. Megias. 2006. Effect of formic acid on performance, digestibility, intestinal histomorphology and plasma metabolite levels of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 47: 50-56. [DOI:10.1080/00071660500475574]
23. Hudha, M.N., M.S. Ali, M.A. Azad, M.M. Hossian, M. Tanjim, S.C. Bormon, M.S. Rahman, M.M. Rahman and A.K. Paul. 2010. Effect of acetic acid on growth and meat yield in broilers. International Journal of Biological Research, 1: 31-35.
24. Isazade, S., N. Mousavi and R. Taherkhani. 2016. Effects of organic acids with different dietary electrolyte balances on growth performance and intestinal microbial population of broiler. Research on Animal Production, 6: 49-60 (In Persian).
25. Islam, M.Z., Z.H. Khandaker, S.D. Chowdhury and K.M.S. Islam. 2008. Effect of citric acid and acetic acid on the performance of broilers. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 6: 315-320. [DOI:10.3329/jbau.v6i2.4828]
26. Izat, A., L.M.H. Adams and M. Cabel. 1990. Effect of formic acid or calcium format in feed on performance of brioler chicks. Poultry Science, 69: 1876-1882. [DOI:10.3382/ps.0691876]
27. Kalantar, M., F. Khajali, A. Yaghobfar, J. Pourreza and M.R. Akbari. 2017. Effects of COMBO® enzyme supplemented wheat and wheat bran diet on growth performance and digesta physicochemical properties of broilers. Research on Animal Production, 8: 49-57 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/rap.8.15.49]
28. Langarodi, N., M. Mohammadi and A.M.M. Rostaei. 2012. Formic acid and probiotic effect on the immune system of broiler chickens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 46: 449-456 (In Persian).
29. Leeson, S., H. Namkung, M. Antongiovanni and E.H. Lee. 2005. Effect of butyric acid on the performance and carcass yield of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 84: 1418-1422. [DOI:10.1093/ps/84.9.1418]
30. Liljeberg, H. and I. Fjorck. 1998. Delayed gastric emptying rate may explain improved glycaemia in healthy subjects to a starchy meal with added vinegar. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 52: 368-371. [DOI:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600572]
31. Patterson, J.A. and K.M. Burkholder. 2003. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science, 82: 627-631. [DOI:10.1093/ps/82.4.627]
32. Pinchasov, Y. and S. Elmaliah. 1995. Broiler chick responses to anorectic agents: Dietary acetic and propionic acids and the blood metabolites. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 39: 107-116. [DOI:10.1159/000177850]
33. Ricke, S.C. 2003. Perspectives on the use of organic acids and short chain fatty acids as antimicrobials. Poultry Science, 82: 632-639. [DOI:10.1093/ps/82.4.632]
34. Salari, A, A., A. Hassanabadi, H. Nassiri Moghaddam and G.A. Kalidari. 2016. The effect of diet acidified with hydrochloric and butyric acids on performance of female broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Production (In Persian).
35. Samanta, S., S. Haldar and G.T. 2010. Comparative efficacy of an organic acid blend and bacitracin methylene disalicylate as growth promoters in broiler chickens: effects on performance, gut histology, and small intestinal milieu. Veterinary Medicine International, 645-650. [DOI:10.4061/2010/645150]
36. SAS Institute. 2003. SAS User's Guide. Statistics. Version 9.1 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
37. Shahidi, F., J. McDonald, A. Chandrasekara and Y. Zhong. 2008. Phytochemicals of foods, beverages and fruit vinegars: chemistry and health effects. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 17: 380-382.
38. Thompson, J.L. and M. Hinton. 1997. Antibacterial activity of formic and propionic acids in the diet of hens and salmonellas in the crop. British Poultry Science, 38: 159-165. [DOI:10.1080/00071669708417941]
39. Van der Zijpp, A.J. and F.R. Leenstra. 1980. Genetic analysis of humoral immune response of white leghorn chicks. Poultry Science, 59: 1363-1369. [DOI:10.3382/ps.0591363]
40. Wolfenden, A.D., J.L. Vicente, J.P. Higgins, R.L. Andreatti Filho, S.E. Higgins, B.M. Hargis and G. Tellez. 2007. Effect of organic acids and probiotics on Salmonella enteritidis infection in broiler chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6: 403-405. [DOI:10.3923/ijps.2007.403.405]

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به پژوهشهای تولیدات دامی می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2019 All Rights Reserved | Research On Animal Production(Scientific and Research)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb