Volume 10, Issue 23 (5-2019)                   rap 2019, 10(23): 144-151 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

zeynadini S, Asadi Fozi M, Ayatolahi A. (2019). Defining appropriate model for genetic analysis of milk yield in different lactations of Iranian Holstein cows. rap. 10(23), 144-151. doi:10.29252/rap.10.23.144
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-609-en.html
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
Abstract:   (3307 Views)

In this study, appropriate genetic co (variance) structure across ages of milk production in the Iranian Holstein cows was modeled using 35167 records originated from 1098 sires and 27236 dams. These data were collected from 110 herds during 2011 to 2015 by the Iranian Animal Breeding Center. For all lactations, birth year, birth month, calving year, calving season, calving month, age and herd were considered as the fixed effects. The effect of the animal age was fitted as a covariate. In this research, maternal genetic and non-genetic effects, the effect of herd-year-season as well as the animal genetic effects were fitted as the random effects. For each lactation, to investigate the importance of fixed and random effects, univariate animal model was used. In order to fit the best model for genetic analysis of the five lactations pre-structured and unstructured multivariate models and repeatability model were used.  The results show in comparison with pre-structure models, unstructured and repeatability models are less appropriate for genetic analysis of milk yield. The results derived from the best model indicate that milk yield is genetically changed up to 3rd lactation but no changes were found for the later lactations therefore, selection accuracy of Iranian Holstein cows could be increased when the additional milk records measured at the second and third lactations are used as well as the first lactation milk records. This issue should be studied economically as measuring the additional records takes more cost. In addition, it is suggested using appropriate models to increase the accuracy of estimated genetic parameters. 

Full-Text [PDF 561 kb]   (761 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: ژنتیک و اصلاح نژاد دام
Received: 2016/05/1 | Revised: 2019/05/22 | Accepted: 2019/03/4 | Published: 2019/05/22

References
1. Asadi Fozi, M., A. Esmaeelizadeh, M. Mohammadabadi and M.A. Forghani. 2008. Genetic analysis of fleece weight at different ages using multivariate models in Merino sheep. 3rd Congress of Animal Science, Mashhad, Iran (In Persian).
2. Asadi Fozi, M., A. Esmaeelizadeh and M. Mohammad abadi. 2007. Modeling appropriate genetic co(variance) structure across ages of fleece weight at different ages in Australian fine wool Merino sheep. 3rd Congress of Animal Science, Mashhad, Iran (In Persian).
3. Asadi Fozi, M., J.H.J. Vander Werf and A. Swan. 2012. Modeling genetic covariance structure across ages of mean fiber diameter in sheep using multivariate and random regression analysis. Animal production science, 52(11): 1019-1026. [DOI:10.1071/AN12139]
4. Albuquerque, L.G. and K. Meyer. 2001. Estimates of direct and maternal genetic effect for weight from birth to 600 days of age in Nelore Cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 118: 83-92 [DOI:10.1046/j.1439-0388.2001.00279.x]
5. Coeli, K.A., A.R. Gilmour and K.D. Atkins. 2008. Comparison of genetic co (variavce) models for annual measurements of fleece weight and fibre diameter. NSW Agriculture & CRC for Premium Quality Wool, Orange Agricultural Institute, Forest Road, Orange, NSW, Australia.
6. Dadpasand Taram Seri, M. 2008. The study of genetic variation in production traits in Iranian Holstein cows. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (In Persian).
7. Falconer, D.S. 1989. Quantitative Genetics. 3rd edition, Longman Scientific and Technical, 548 pp.
8. Glimur, A.R., B.J. Gogel, B.R. Cullis and R. Thompson. 2009. ASReml user guide. NSW Department of Industry and Investment, VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK.
9. Molavifar, S. and M. Asadi Fozi. 2013. Life time genetic analysis of growth trait in Rayeni Cashmere goat. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran (In Persian).
10. Maniatis, N. and G.E. Pollott. 2003. The impact of data structure on genetic (co)variance components of early growth in sheep, estimated using animal model with maternal effects. Journal of Animal Science, 81: 101-108. [DOI:10.2527/2003.811101x]
11. Mrode, R.A. 2005. Linear Models for the prediction of Animal Breeding values. 2nd edition, CABI Publishing, UK, 344 pp. [DOI:10.1079/9780851990002.0000]
12. Safi Jahanshahi, A., R. Vaez Torshizi, N. Emam Jomeh Kashan and M.B. Sayyad Nejad. 2002. An estimate of genetic parameters of milk production traits for Iranian Holstein dairy cattle using different animal models. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 34: 24-31 (In Persian).
13. Savar Sofla, S. and M. Eskandari Nasab. 2008. Estimation of genetic parameters of production traits of Holstein cows in different climate regions of Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, 15(3): 152-158 (In Persian).
14. Sheikhlou, M.R., J. Shojae, N. Pirani, S. Alijani and A. Rafat. 2010. Estimation of Heritability and Repeatability for Milk and fat Yields in Iranian Holstein Cattle Using Univariate and Multivariate Models. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 19: 61-68 (In Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research On Animal Production

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb