Volume 9, Issue 22 (12-2018)                   rap 2018, 9(22): 111-118 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
iranmanesh M, Esmailizadeh A, Mohammad abadi M R. (2018). Mapping Quantitative Trait Affecting Live Weight on Chromosome 5 in Japanese Quail . rap. 9(22), 111-118. doi:10.29252/rap.9.22.111
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-452-en.html
Mapping Quantitative Trait Affecting Live Weight on Chromosome 5 in Japanese Quail
Mahboubeh Iranmanesh , Ali Esmailizadeh , Mohammad reza Mohammad abadi
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
Abstract:   (2817 Views)

The purpose of this work was to scan chromosome 5 for mapping QTL affecting live weight in an F2 population. A three generation resource population was developed by using two distinct Japanese quail strains, wild and white to map quantitative trait loci underlying hatching weight and growth traits.  Eight pairs of white (S) and wild (W) birds were crossed reciprocally and 34 F1 birds were produced. The F1 birds were intercrossed to generate 422 F2 offspring. All of the birds from three generations (472 birds) were genotyped for three microsatellite markers on chromosome 5. Studied traits in this research were live weight from hatch to 5 weeks of age. QTL analysis was conducted applying the line-cross model and the least-squares interval mapping approach. In different situation QTL were live weight at hatch, live detected for weight at 1 week and 2 week. Although was theadditive effect for detected QTL significant but the dominant and tmprinting effects on these traits was not significant and the variance explained by the detected additive QTL effects ranged from 1.1 to 3.6 for different tariats.

Keywords: Japanese Quail, Live Weight, Mapping QTL, Microsatellite Marker
Full-Text [PDF 397 kb]   (1177 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: ژنتیک و اصلاح نژاد دام
Received: 2015/02/16 | Revised: 2019/01/28 | Accepted: 2016/12/25 | Published: 2019/01/26
References
1. Aslam, M.L., J.W.M. Bastiaansen, R.P.M.A. Crooijmans, A. Vereijken, H.J. Megens and M.A.M. Groenen. 2011. Whole genome QTL mapping for growth, meat quality and breast meat yield traits in Turkey, BMC Genetics, 12: 61. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2156-12-61]
2. Eamailizadeh, A.K., A. Baghizadeh and M. Ahmadizadeh. 2012. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting bodyweight on chromosome 1 in a commercial strain of Japanese quail. Animal Production Science, 52: 64-68. [DOI:10.1071/AN11220]
3. Honkatukia, M., M. Tuiskula-Haavisto and J. Vilkki. 2007. Chromosome region affecting body weight in egg layer. Agricultural and Food Science, 16: 177-187. [DOI:10.2137/145960607782219355]
4. Jabbari Ori, R., A. EsmailZadeh, M. Ahmadizade and H. Charati. 2015. Study of the genetic group effects on behavioral and production traits and estimation of heterosis effect for carcass weight in Japanese quail (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica). Research on Animal Production, 6: 173-181.
5. Kayang, B.B., A. Vignal, M. Inoue-Murayama, M. Miwa, J.L. Monvosin, S. Ito and F. Minvieele. 2004. A first-generation microsatellite linkage map of the Japanese quail. Animal Genetics, 35: 195-200. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01135.x]
6. Li, H., N. Deeb, H. Zhou, A.D. Mitchell, C.M. Ashwell and S.J. Lamont. 2003. Chicken quantitative trait loci for growth and body composition associated with transforming growth factor-beta genes. Poultry Science, 82: 347-56. [DOI:10.1093/ps/82.3.347]
7. Marks, H.L. 1993. Carcass composition feed intake and feed efficiency following long-term selection for four-week body weight in Japanese quail. Poultry Science, 72: 1005-1011. [DOI:10.3382/ps.0721005]
8. Minvielle, F., B. Kayang, M. Inoue-Murayama, M. Miwa, A. Vignal, D. Gourichon, A. Neau, J. Monvoisin and S. Ito. 2005. Microsatellite mapping of qTL affecting growth, feed consumption egg production, tonic immobility and body temperature of Japanese quail. Genomics, 6: 87. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2164-6-87]
9. Nasirifar, E., A. Esmailizadeh Koshkoiyeh, H. Moradian, S. Sohrabi and M. Talebi. 2017. Study of quantitative trait loci affecting growth traits in Japanese quail usinga paternal half-sib design. Research on Animal Production, 8: 122-129. [DOI:10.29252/rap.8.17.122]
10. Nie, Q.H., M.X. Fang, L. Xie, X. Shen, J. Liu, Z.P. Luo, J.J. Shi and X.Q. Zhang. 2010. Associations of ATGL gene polymorphisms with chicken growth and fat traits. Genetics, 51: 185-191. [DOI:10.1007/BF03195726]
11. Seaton, G., J. Hernandez, J.A. Grunchec, I. White, J. Allen, D.J. De Koning, W. Wei, D. Berry, C. Haley and S. Knott. 2006. GridQTL: A Grid Portal for QTL Mapping of Compute Intensive Datasets. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
12. Uemoto, Y., S. Sato, S. Odawara, H. Nokata, Y. Oyamada, Y. Taguchi, S. Yanai, O. Sasaki, H. Takahashi, K. Nirasawa and E. Kobayashi. 2011. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting growth and carcass trait in F2 Intercross chickens. Poultry Science, 88: 477-482. [DOI:10.3382/ps.2008-00296]
13. Wang, S.Z., X.X. Hu, Z.P. Wang, X.C. Li, Q.G. Wang, Y.X. Wang, Z.Q. Tang and H. Li. 2012. Quantitative trait loci associated with body weight and abdominal fat traits on chicken chromosomes 3, 5 and 7. Genetics and Molecular Research, 11: 956-65. [DOI:10.4238/2012.April.19.1]
14. Zhou, H., N. Deeb, C.M. Evock-Clover, C.M. Ashwell and S.J. Lamont. 2006. Genome-Wide linkage analysis to identify chromosomal regions affecting phenotypic traits in the chicken: Growth and average daily gain. Poultry Science, 85: 1700-1711. [DOI:10.1093/ps/85.10.1700]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research On Animal Production

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb