1. AbdolahiArpanahi, R. (2017). Comparison of parametric and resampling methods in genetic evaluation of quantitative traits with different genetic structure. Animal Production, 19(1), 1-12. 10.22059/jap.2017.206657.623047.
2. Aliloo, H., Pryce, J. E., González-Recio, O., Cocks, B. G., & Hayes, B. J. (2016). Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits. Genetics Selection Evolution, 48(1), 1-11. 10.1186/s12711-016-0186-0. [
DOI:10.1186/s12711-016-0186-0]
3. Ashoori-Banaei, S., Ghafouri-Kesbi, F., & Ahmadi, A. (2021). Comparison of regression tree-based methods in genomic selection. Journal of Genetics, 100, 1-8. 10.1007/s12041-021-01334-x. [
DOI:10.1007/s12041-021-01334-x]
4. Baneh, H., Nejati-Javaremi, A., Rahimi-Mianji, G. H., & Honarvar, M. (2017). Genomic evaluation of threshold traits with different genetic architecture using bayesian approaches. Research on Animal Production, 8(6). 10.29252/rap.8.15.149. [
DOI:10.29252/rap.8.15.149]
5. Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. Machine learning, 45, 5-32. [
DOI:10.1023/A:1010933404324]
6. de Villemereuil, P. (2018). Quantitative Genetic Methods Depending on the Nature of the Phenotypic Trait. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1422(1), 29-47. 10.1111/nyas.13571. [
DOI:10.1111/nyas.13571]
7. Doublet, A. C., Croiseau, P., Fritz, S., Michenet, A., Hozé, C., Danchin-Burge, C., ... & Restoux, G. (2019). The impact of genomic selection on genetic diversity and genetic gain in three French dairy cattle breeds. Genetics Selection Evolution, 51, 1-13. 10.1186/s12711-019-0495-1. [
DOI:10.1186/s12711-019-0495-1]
8. Endelman, J.B. (2011). Ridge Regression and Other Kernels for Genomic Selection with R Package rrblup. The plant genome, 4(3) 10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024. [
DOI:10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024]
9. Ghafouri-Kesbi, F., Rahimi-Mianji, G., Honarvar, M., & Nejati-Javaremi, A. (2016). Predictive ability of random forests, boosting, support vector machines and genomic best linear unbiased prediction in different scenarios of genomic evaluation. Animal Production Science, 57(2), 229-236. 10.1071/AN15538. [
DOI:10.1071/AN15538]
10. Gianola, D. (1982). Theory and Analysis of Threshold Characters. Journal of animal Science, 54(5), 1079-1096. 10.2527/jas1982.5451079x. [
DOI:10.2527/jas1982.5451079x]
11. de los Campos, P.P.R. (2022). BGLR: Bayesian Generalized Linear Regression. Available At: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BGLR/BGLR.pdf
12. Henderson, C.R. (1975). Best Linear Unbiased Estimation and Prediction under a Selection Model. Biometrics, 423-447. 10.2307/2529430. [
DOI:10.2307/2529430]
13. Hill, W. & A. Robertson. (1968). Linkage Disequilibrium in Finite Populations. Theoretical and applied genetics, 38, 226-231. 10.1007/BF01245622. [
DOI:10.1007/BF01245622]
14. Hill, W.G. (2008). Estimation, Effectiveness and Opportunities of Long Term Genetic Improvement in Animals and Maize. Lohmann information, 43(1), 3-20.
15. Howard, R., Carriquiry, A. L., & Beavis, W. D. (2014). Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods for genomic selection of traits with additive and epistatic genetic architectures. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 4(6), 1027-1046. 10.1534/g3.114.010298. [
DOI:10.1534/g3.114.010298]
16. Legarra, A., & Reverter, A. (2018). Semi-parametric estimates of population accuracy and bias of predictions of breeding values and future phenotypes using the LR method. Genetics Selection Evolution, 50, 1-18. 10.1186/s12711-018-0426-6. [
DOI:10.1186/s12711-018-0426-6]
17. Liaw, A. (2022). Breiman and Cutler's Random Forests for Classification and Regression. Available At: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/randomForest/index.html
18. Macedo, F. L., Christensen, O. F., Astruc, J. M., Aguilar, I., Masuda, Y., & Legarra, A. (2020). Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups. Genetics Selection Evolution, 52(1), 1-10. 10.1186/s12711-020-00567-1. [
DOI:10.1186/s12711-020-00567-1]
19. Meuwissen, T. H., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. (2001). Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. genetics, 157(4), 1819-1829. 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819. [
DOI:10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819]
20. Mohammadi, Y. (2018). Accuracy of Genomic Selection Using Models with Additive Effects for Productive Traits in Iranian Holstein Cows. The second international conference and the third national conference on agriculture, environment and food security, Jiroft University, Jiroft, Iran.
21. Mohammadi, Y., & Sattaei Mokhtari, M. (2018). Genomic selection accuracy parametric and nonparametric statistical methods with additive and dominance genetic architectures. Research On Animal Production (Scientific and Research), 8(18), 161-167. 10.29252/rap.8.18.161. [
DOI:10.29252/rap.8.18.161]
22. Neves, H. H., Carvalheiro, R., & Queiroz, S. A. (2012). A comparison of statistical methods for genomic selection in a mice population. BMC genetics, 13(1), 1-17. 10.1186/1471-2156-13-100. [
DOI:10.1186/1471-2156-13-100]
23. Ogutu, J. O., Piepho, H. P., & Schulz-Streeck, T. (2011). A comparison of random forests, boosting and support vector machines for genomic selection. In BMC proceedings (Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 1-5). BioMed Central. [
DOI:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S11]
24. Piepho, H. P., Ogutu, J. O., Schulz‐Streeck, T., Estaghvirou, B., Gordillo, A., & Technow, F. (2012). Efficient computation of ridge‐regression best linear unbiased prediction in genomic selection in plant breeding. Crop Science, 52(3), 1093-1104. 10.2135/cropsci2011.11.0592. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2011.11.0592]
25. Ridgeway, G. (2022). gbm; Generalized Boosted Regression Models a Vailable At http://cran.r-project.org/packages/gbm/index.html.
26. Salehi, A., Bazrafshan, M., & Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R. (2021). Assessment of parametric and non-parametric methods for prediction of quantitative traits with non-additive genetic architecture. Annals of Animal Science, 21(2), 469-484. 10.2478/aoas-2020-0087. [
DOI:10.2478/aoas-2020-0087]
27. Schulz-Streeck, T., B. Estaghvirou & F. Technow. (2015). Package 'Rrblup-Method6'. Available At: https://mran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2016-10-12/web/packages/rrBlupMethod6/index.html
28. Technow, F. (2013). Hypred: Simulation of Genomic Data in Applied Genetics. Available At: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/hypred/index.html
29. Teimuria, M., Shariati, M. M., & Aslaminejad, A. A. (2016). Comparison of methods for the implementation of genomic selection in Holstein. Research on Animal Production, 7(14), 198-203. 7(14), 198-203. 10.29252/rap.7.14.203. [
DOI:10.29252/rap.7.14.203]
30. Therneau, T., B. Atkinson and B. Ripley B. 2022. Rpart: Recursive Partitioning for Classification, Regression and Survival Trees. An Implementation of Most of the Functionality of the 1984 Book by Breiman, Friedman, Olshen and Stone. Available At: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rpart/index.html
31. Wickham, H. (2018). Pryr: Useful Tools to Pry Back the Covers of R and Understand the Language at a Deeper Level. Available At: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pryr/index.html
32. Zhang, A., Wang, H., Beyene, Y., Semagn, K., Liu, Y., Cao, S., ... & Zhang, X. (2017). Effect of trait heritability, training population size and marker density on genomic prediction accuracy estimation in 22 bi-parental tropical maize populations. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1916. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01916. [
DOI:10.3389/fpls.2017.01916]