1. Ahmadi, M., & Karimi Torshizi, M. A. (2016). Effects of dietary vermi-humus in comparison to virginiamycin on performance and small intestinal morphometric parameters in Japanese Quails. Research on Animal Production, 7(13), 86-77. (In Persian). [
DOI:10.18869/acadpub.rap.7.13.86]
2. Arif, M., Alagawany, M., Abd El-Hack, M. E., Saeed, M., Arain, M. A., & Elnesr, S. S. (2019). Humic acid as a feed additive in poultry diets: A review. Iranian journal of veterinary research, 20(3), 167.
3. Aristimunha, P. C., Mallheiros, R. D., Ferket, P. R., Cardinal, K. M., Moreira Filho, A. L. D. B., Santos, E. T., ... & Ribeiro, A. M. L. (2020). Effect of dietary organic acids and humic substance supplementation on performance, immune response and gut morphology of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 29(1), 85-94. [
DOI:10.3382/japr/pfz031]
4. Avci, M., Denek, N., & Kaplan, O. (2007). Effects of humic acid at different levels on growth performance, carcass yields and some biochemical parameters of quails. Journal of Animal and veterinary Advances.
5. Boka, J., Mahdavi, A. H., Samie, A. H., & Jahanian, R. (2014). Effect of different levels of black cumin (N igella sativa L.) on performance, intestinal E scherichia coli colonization and jejunal morphology in laying hens. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 98(2), 373-383. [
DOI:10.1111/jpn.12109]
6. Botsoglou, N. A., Fletouris, D. J., Papageorgiou, G. E., Vassilopoulos, V. N., Mantis, A. J., & Trakatellis, A. G. (1994). Rapid, sensitive, and specific thiobarbituric acid method for measuring lipid peroxidation in animal tissue, food, and feedstuff samples. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 42(9), 1931-1937. [
DOI:10.1021/jf00045a019]
7. Celik, K., Uzatici, A., & AKIN, A. (2008). Effects of dietary humic acid and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on performance and biochemical parameters of broiler chickens. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 3(5). [
DOI:10.3923/ajava.2008.344.350]
8. Dierick, N. A. (1989). Biotechnology aids to improve feed and feed digestion: enzymes and fermentation. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 39(3), 241-261. [
DOI:10.1080/17450398909429530]
9. Ehrmann, M. A., Kurzak, P., Bauer, J., & Vogel, R. F. (2002). Characterization of lactobacilli towards their use as probiotic adjuncts in poultry. Journal of applied microbiology, 92(5), 966-975. [
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01608.x]
10. Ergin, O., Isa, C., Nuh, O., & Guray, E. (2009). Effects of dietary humic substances on egg production and egg shell quality of hens after peak laying period. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(6).
11. Francesch, M., Perez-Verdrell, A. M., Esteve-Garcia, E., & Brufau, J. (1995). Enzyme supplementation of a barley and sunflower-based diet on laying hen performance. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 4(1), 32-40. [
DOI:10.1093/japr/4.1.32]
12. Galobart, J., Barroeta, A. C., Baucells, M. D., & Guardiola, F. (2001). Lipid oxidation in fresh and spray-dried eggs enriched with ω3 and ω6 polyunsaturated fatty acids during storage as affected by dietary vitamin E and canthaxanthin supplementation. Poultry Science, 80(3), 327-337. [
DOI:10.1093/ps/80.3.327]
13. Genchev, A. (2012). Quality and composition of Japanese quail eggs (Coturnix japonica). Trakia Journal of Sciences, 10(2), 91-101.
14. Gomez-Rosales, S., & Angeles, M. D. L. (2015). Addition of a worm leachate as source of humic substances in the drinking water of broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 28(2), 215. [
DOI:10.5713/ajas.14.0321]
15. Hakan, K. B., Gultekin, Y., & Ozge, S. (2012). Effects of boric acid and humate supplementation on performance and egg quality parameters of laying hens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 14, 283-289. [
DOI:10.1590/S1516-635X2012000400008]
16. Hayirli, A., Esenbuğa, N., Macit, M., Yörük, M. A., Yıldız, A., & Karaca, H. (2005). Nutrition practice to alleviate the adverse effects of stress on laying performance, metabolic profile and egg quality in peak producing hens: II. The probiotic supplementation. Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences, 18(12), 1752-1760. [
DOI:10.5713/ajas.2005.1752]
17. Hrnčár, C., Hanusová, E., Hanus, A., Capcarová, M., Kalafová, A., Arpášová, H., ... & Bujko, J. (2020). The Effect of Probiotic and Humic Acids on Internal and External Egg Quality of Japanese Quails. Scientific Papers: Animal Science & Biotechnologies/Lucrari Stiintifice: Zootehnie si Biotehnologii, 53(2).
18. SAS Institute. (2004). SAS/ETS 9.1 User's Guide. SAS Institute.
19. Islam, K. M. S., Schuhmacher, A., & Gropp, J. M. (2005). Humic acid substances in animal agriculture. Pakistan Journal of nutrition, 4(3), 126-134. [
DOI:10.3923/pjn.2005.126.134]
20. Kalafova, A., Hrncar, C., Zbynovska, K., Bucko, O., Hanusova, E., Kapustova, Z., ... & Capcarova, M. (2018). The effects of dietary probiotics and humic acid on meat quality of Japanese quail including sex-related differences and economical background. Biologia, 73, 765-771. [
DOI:10.2478/s11756-018-0085-7]
21. Kamel, M. M., Elhady, M., El Iraqi, K. G., & Wahba, F. (2015). Biologycal immune stimulants effects on immune response, behavioral and productive performance of briolers. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal, 35.(3)
22. Khajavi, H. R., Torshizi, M. A., & Ahmadi, H. (2014). Effect of feeding different levels of dietary vermi-humus on growth performance and meat quality in broiler chickens. Animal Production, 16(2), 113-122. (In Persian).
23. Kocabağli, N., Alp, M., Acar, N., & Kahraman, R. (2002). The effects of dietary humate supplementation on broiler growth and carcass yield. Poultry Science, 81(2), 227-230. [
DOI:10.1093/ps/81.2.227]
24. Kucukersan, S. E. H. E. R., Kucukersan, K., Goncuoglu, E., & Sahin, T. (2004). The effects of dietary humate supplementation on laying hen egg production and egg quality. Indian veterinary journal, 81(6).
25. Macit, M., Karaoglu, M., Celebi, S., Esenbuga, N., Yoruk, M. A., & Kaya, A. (2021). Effects of supplementation of dietary humate, probiotic, and their combination on performance, egg quality, and yolk fatty acid composition of laying hens. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53, 1-8. [
DOI:10.1007/s11250-020-02546-6]
26. Mathlouthi, N., Lallès, J. P., Lepercq, P., Juste, C., & Larbier, M. (2002). Xylanase and β-glucanase supplementation improve conjugated bile acid fraction in intestinal contents and increase villus size of small intestine wall in broiler chickens fed a rye-based diet. Journal of Animal Science, 80(11), 2773-2779. [
DOI:10.2527/2002.80112773x]
27. Maysa, H., & Sheikh, A. (2008). The effect of dietary humic acid supplementation on some productive and physiological traits of laying hens. Egypt poultry science, 28(4), 1043-1058.
28. Netherwood, T., Gilbert, H. J., Parker, D. S., & O'donnell, A. G. (1999). Probiotics shown to change bacterial community structure in the avian gastrointestinal tract. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65(11), 5134-5138. [
DOI:10.1128/AEM.65.11.5134-5138.1999]
29. National Research Council. (1994). Nutrient requirements of poultry: 1994. National Academies Press.
30. Pettit, R. E. (2004). Organic matter, humus, humate, humic acid, fulvic acid and humin: their importance in soil fertility and plant health. CTI Research, 10, 1-7.
31. Rath, N. C., Huff, W. E., & Huff, G. R. (2006). Effects of humic acid on broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 85(3), 410-414. [
DOI:10.1093/ps/85.3.410]
32. Sahin, A., İskender, H., Terim, K. K., Altinkaynak, K., Hayirli, A., Gonultas, A., & Kaynar, O. (2016). The effect of humic acid substances on the thyroid function and structure in lead poisoning. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 18, 649-654. [
DOI:10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0299]
33. Schepetkin, I. A., Khlebnikov, A. I., Ah, S. Y., Woo, S. B., Jeong, C. S., Klubachuk, O. N., & Kwon, B. S. (2003). Characterization and biological activities of humic substances from mumie. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 51(18), 5245-5254. [
DOI:10.1021/jf021101e]
34. Shermer, C. L., Maciorowski, K. G., Bailey, C. A., Byers, F. M., & Ricke, S. C. (1998). Caecal metabolites and microbial populations in chickens consuming diets containing a mined humate compound. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 77(4), 479-486.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199808)77:4<479::AID-JSFA607>3.0.CO;2-L [
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199808)77:43.0.CO;2-L]
35. Taklimi, S. M. S. M., Ghahri, H., & Isakan, M. A. (2012). Influence of different levels of humic acid and esterified glucomannan on growth performance and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Agric. Sci, 3, 663-668. [
DOI:10.4236/as.2012.35080]
36. Wang, J. P., He, K. R., Ding, X. M., Luo, Y. H., Bai, S. P., Zeng, Q. F., ... & Zhang, K. Y. (2016). Effect of dietary vanadium and vitamin C on egg quality and antioxidant status in laying hens. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 100(3), 440-447. [
DOI:10.1111/jpn.12377]
37. Wang, Q., Chen, Y. J., Yoo, J. S., Kim, H. J., Cho, J. H., & Kim, I. H. (2008). Effects of supplemental humic substances on growth performance, blood characteristics and meat quality in finishing pigs. Livestock Science, 117(2-3), 270-274. [
DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2007.12.024]
38. Yalçın, S., Ergün, A., Özsoy, B., Yalçın, S., & Erol, H. (2006). The effects of dietary supplementation of L-carnitine and humic substances on performance, egg traits and blood parameters in laying hens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. [
DOI:10.5713/ajas.2006.1478]
39. Yeo, J., & Kim, K. I. (1997). Effect of feeding diets containing an antibiotic, a probiotic, or yucca extract on growth and intestinal urease activity in broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 76(2), 381-385. [
DOI:10.1093/ps/76.2.381]
40. Yörük, M. A., Gül, M., Hayirli, A., & Macit, M. (2004). The effects of supplementation of humate and probiotic on egg production and quality parameters during the late laying period in hens. Poultry Science, 83(1), 84-88. [
DOI:10.1093/ps/83.1.84]
41. Zhorina, L. V., & Stepchenko, L. M. (1991, January). The content of free amino acids in the tissues of broiler chicks administered sodium humate in the ration. In Nauchnye Doklady Vysshei Shkoly. Biologicheskie Nauki (No. 10, pp. 147-150).