1. Abdollahzadeh, F., R. Pirmohammadi, F. Fatehi and I. Bernousi. 2010. Effect of feeding ensiled mixed tomato and apple pomace on performance of Holstein dairy cows. Slovak. Journal of Animal Science, 43: 31-35. [
DOI:10.4081/ijas.2010.e41]
2. Alipour, M., A. Azarfar, A. Kiani and M. Khaladi. 2017. Effect of adding monensin with and without metaphyses on rumen fermentation parameters and fatty acid pattern of fattening lambs of Farahani. Iranian Animal Science, 48(1): 99-89 (In Persian).
3. Bach, A., S. Calsamiglia and M.D. Stern. 2005. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science, 88(E Suppl.): E9-E21. [
DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73133-7]
4. Batajoo, K.K. and R.D. Shaver. 1994. Impact of non-fiber carbohydrate on intake, digestion and milk production by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 77: 1580-1588. [
DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77100-9]
5. Beckman, J.L. and W.P. Weiss. 2005. Nutrient digestibility of diets with different fiber to starch ratios when fed to lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 88: 1015-1023. [
DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72769-7]
6. Broderick, G.A. 2003. Effects of varying dietary protein and energy levels on the production of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 86: 1370-1381. [
DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73721-7]
7. Chrstesen, R.A., M.R. Cameron and T.H. Klusmeyer. 1993. Influence of amount and degradability of dietry protein on nitrogen utilization by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 79: 3497. [
DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77689-4]
8. Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple ranges and Multiple F-test. Biometrics, 11: 1-42. [
DOI:10.2307/3001478]
9. Firkins, J.L., Z. Yu and M. Morrison. 2007. Ruminal nitrogen metabolism: perspectives for integration of microbiology and nutrition for dairy. Journal of Dairy Science, 90 (E. Suppl): E1-E16. [
DOI:10.3168/jds.2006-518]
10. Gasa, J., C. Castrillo, M.D. Baucells and J.A. Guada. 1989. By-products from the canning industry as feedstuff for ruminants: Digestibility and its prediction from chemical composition and laboratory bioassays. Animal. Feed Science Technol, 25: 67-77. [
DOI:10.1016/0377-8401(89)90108-9]
11. Getachew, G., G.M. Crovetto, M. Fondevila, U. Krishnamoorthy and B. Singh. 2002. Laboratory variation of 24 hin vitro gas production and estimated metabolizable energy value of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science Technology, 102: 169-180. [
DOI:10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00212-2]
12. Gurbuz, Y. 2007. Determination of nutritional value of leaves of several vitis vinifera varieties as a source of alternative feedstuff for sheep using in vitro and in situ measurement. Small Ruminant Research, 71: 59-66. [
DOI:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.04.009]
13. Krehbiel, C., S. Rust, G. Zhang and S. Gilliland. 2003. Bacterial direct-fed microbials in ruminant diets: Performance response and mode of action. Journal of Animal Science, 81(14 suppl-2): E120.
14. Maheri-Sis, N., M. Chamani, A.A. Sadeghi and A. Mirzaaghazadeh. 2012. Effect of drying and ensiling on in situ cell wall degradation kinetics of tomato pomace in ruminant. Asian Journal of Animal Science, 6: 196-202. [
DOI:10.3923/ajas.2012.196.202]
15. Martin, J.L.K. and M.C. Black. 1998. Biomarker assessment of the effects of coal-strip mine contamination on channel catfish. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 41(3): 307-320. [
DOI:10.1006/eesa.1998.1714]
16. Nisbet, D.J. and S.A. Martin. 1991. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on lactate utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Journal of Animal Science, 69: 4628-4633. [
DOI:10.2527/1991.69114628x]
17. Rim, J.S., S.R. Lee, Y.S. Cho, E.J. Kim, J.S. Kim and K.H. Jong. 2008. Prediction of dry matter intake in lactating Holstein dairy cows offered high levels of concentrate. Asian-Aust. Journal of Animal Science, 21: 677-684. [
DOI:10.5713/ajas.2008.70398]
18. Saedi, H., M. Nikpour Tehrani and A. Morvarid. 1992. Animal Feeds and their Preservation Methods (Principles of animal feeding). Tehran University Press.
19. Safari, R., R. Valizadeh, J. Bayat Kouhsar, A.A. Nasserian and A.A. Tahmasebi. 2011. The effect of feeding diets containing dried or ensiled tomato pomace on Holstein dairy cattle performance. Journal of Animal Science Research, 2: 91-99.
20. SAS, Institute. 2003. SAS User's Guide. Version 9.1 ed. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
21. Satter, L.D. and L.L. Slyter. 1974 Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition, 32: 199-208. [
DOI:10.1079/BJN19740073]
22. Schang, M.J., J.O. Azcona. 1998. Performance of laying hens fed a corn-sunflower diet supplemented with enzymes. In: Lyons T.P., Jacques K.A. (Eds.). Passport to the Year 2000, Biotechnology in the feed Industry. Proceedings of All techs 14th Annual Symposium. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK, 405-410.
23. Therion, J., J.A. Kistner and J.H. Kornelius. 1982. Effect of pH on growth rates of rumen amylolytic and lactilytic bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 44(2): 428-434. [
DOI:10.1128/AEM.44.2.428-434.1982]
24. Ventura, M.R., M.C. Pieltain and J.I.R. Castanon. 2009. Evaluation of tomato crop by-products as feed for goats. Animal Feed Science Technology. 154: 271-275. [
DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.09.004]
25. Weiss, W.P., D.L. Frobose and M.E. Koch. 1997. Wet tomato pomace ensiled with corn plants for dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 80: 2896-2900. [
DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76254-4]