Volume 10, Issue 24 (9-2019)                   Res Anim Prod 2019, 10(24): 120-126 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

seyedsharifi R, badbarin S, khamisabadi H, hedayat evrigh N, seif davati J. (2019). Study of Genetic Structure and Accuracy of Assignment of Individuals to Five Horse Populations using Microsatellite Markers. Res Anim Prod. 10(24), 120-126. doi:10.29252/rap.10.24.120
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-996-en.html
University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
Abstract:   (3463 Views)

In some cases, due to overlapping of morphological traits and parents incomplete recording information, it is difficult to determine the breed origin of a horse. The use of molecular methods for assigning individuals to their breed can be a significant help in this regard. The present study was conducted to investigate the genetic structure and the accuracy of the assignment of horses to the origin populations using microsatellite markers. For this purpose, samples from 165 horses including Caspian (35), Arabian (36), Turkoman (30), Thoroughbred (28) and Turkoman - Thoroughbred crossbred population (36) were randomly collected. Polymerase chain reaction was performed using 12 microsatellite markers recommended by the International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG), and the PCR products were separated by 8% acryl amide gel and stained using silver nitrate staining procedure. Estimation of genetic parameters such as the number of effective alleles and the expected heterozygosity level showed a high genetic variation in the used markers. Among them AHT4 marker showed the highest (11.20 alleles) and the AHT5 showed the lowest (4. 28) effective alleles and AHT4 (0.82) showed the highest and ASB17 (0.67) showed the lowest genetic variation. The highest and lowest genetic distances were observed between Thoroughbred with Arabian and Caspian (0.91) and Thoroughbred with crossbred population (10.0). In conclusion, the markers used in this study, could correctly assign 79% of the individuals to their source populations. Therefore, in some cases microsatellite markers can be a helpful tool for determining the breed origin of the horse.

Full-Text [PDF 1168 kb]   (1242 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: ژنتیک و اصلاح نژاد دام
Received: 2019/02/23 | Revised: 2019/09/21 | Accepted: 2019/04/22 | Published: 2019/09/18

References
1. Aljumaah, R.S., M.M. Alobre and R.M. Alatiyat. 2015. Use of microsatellite markers to assign goats to their breeds. Genetics and Molecular Research, 14(3): 9071-9080. [DOI:10.4238/2015.August.7.16]
2. Baumung, R., V. Cubric-Curik, K. Schwend, R. Achmann and J. Solkner. 2006. Genetic characterization and breed assignment in Austrian sheep breeds using microsatellite marker information. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 123: 265-271. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00583.x]
3. Behl, R., J. Behl, A. Gupta, S.C. Gupta and S.P.S. Ahlawat. 2007. Individual identification and breed allocation with microsatellite markers: An evaluation in Indian horses. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 20(1): 25-30. [DOI:10.5713/ajas.2007.25]
4. Behroozinia, Q., S.D. Mirhosseini, F. Afraz, A. Sohrabi A. Mohammadi, P. Shahbazi and B. Honey. 2011. Genetic description of two Iranian Turkmen horse populations of Turkmen Sahra and Turkmen Jergalan regions using microsatellite markers. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 3(1): 63-66 (In Persian).
5. Bjornstad, G. and K.H. Roed. 2001. Breed demarcation and potential for breed allocation of horses assessed by microsatellite markers. Animal Genetics, 32: 59-65. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2052.2001.00705.x]
6. Bjornstad, G. and K.H. Roed. 2002. Evaluation of factors affecting individual assignment precision using microsatellite data from horse breeds and simulated breed crosses. Animal Genetics, 33: 264-270. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2052.2002.00868.x]
7. Ciampolini, R., V. Cetica, E. Ciani, E. Mozzanti, X. Fosella and F. Marroni. 2006. Statistical analysis of individual assignment tests among four cattle breeds using fifteen STR loci. Journal of Animal Science, 84: 11-19. [DOI:10.2527/2006.84111x]
8. Cornuet, J.M., S. Piry, G. Luikart, A. Estoup and M. Solignac. 1999. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics, 153: 1989-2000.
9. Dalvit, C., M. De Marchi, R. Dal Zotto, M. Gervaso, T. Meuwissen and M. Cassandro. 2008. Breed assignment test in four Italian beef cattle breeds. Meat Science, 80: 389-395. [DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.01.001]
10. Ghasemi M., M.R. Mohammad Abadi, A.S. Esmaeilizadeh Kashkoyeh and M. Montazeri. 2016. Investigation of the attribution of individuals to camels in northern Kerman province using microsatellite markers. Modern Genetics Journal, 11(3): 329-335 (In Persian).
11. Hemati, B., M.H. Banabazi, S. Shahkarami, E. Mohandesan and P. Burger. 2017. Genetic diversity within Bactrian camel population of Ardebil province. Research on Animal Production, 8(16): 192-197. [DOI:10.29252/rap.8.16.192]
12. Maudet, C., G. Luikart and P. Taberlet. 2002. Genetic diversity and assignment tests among seven French cattle breeds based on microsatellite DNA analysis. Journal of Animal Science, 80: 942-950. [DOI:10.2527/2002.804942x]
13. Miller, S.A., D.D. Dykes and H.F. Polesky. 1988. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Research, 16: 12-15. [DOI:10.1093/nar/16.3.1215]
14. Montazeri, M., A.S. Massoudi, R. Preacher and D. Khan Khorasani. 2014. Investigating the attribution of individuals to populations of Iranian native dogs using microsatellite markers. Animal Biotechnology Journal, 6(2): 177-188 (In Persian).
15. Peakall, R. and P.E. Smouse. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Bioinformatics, 28: 2537-2539. [DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460]
16. Pirani, N. and A. Mohammad Hashemi. 2010. Individuals assignment to six domesticated chicken populations using microsatellite markers. Animal Science Research, 4(1): 55-65 (In Persian).
17. Piry, S., A. Alapetite, J. M. Cornuet, D. Paetkau, L. Baudouin and A. Estoup. 2004. GeneClass2: A Software for Genetic Assignment and First Generation Migrant Detection. Journal of Heredity, 95: 536-539. [DOI:10.1093/jhered/esh074]
18. Samozad, M., M. Nasiri, A.S. Aslami Nezhad, M. Tahmores Poor, M. Dosti and A.J. Ghiadi. 2011. Genetic Diversity Investigation in Iranian Turkman Horses using 4 microsatellite markers. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 4(4): 345-351 (In Persian).
19. Talle, S.B., E. Fimland, O. Syrstad, T. Meuwissen and H. Klungland. 2005. Comparison of individual assignment methods and factors affecting assignment success in cattle breeds using microsatellites. Acta Agriculturae, 55: 74-79. [DOI:10.1080/09064700500435416]
20. Thirstrup, J.P., C. Pertoldi and V. Loeschcke. 2008. Genetic analysis, breed assignment and conservation priorities of three native Danish horse breeds. Animal Genetics, 39: 496-505. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01767.x]
21. Van de Goor, L.H.P., W.A. Van Haeringen and J.A. Lenstra. 2011. Population studies of 17 equine STR for forensic and phylogenetic analysis. Animal Genetics, 42: 627-633. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02194.x]
22. Yeh, F.C., R.C. Yang and T. Boyle. 2000. POPGENE VERSION 1.32: Microsoft Window-based Freeware for Population Genetic Analysis. University of Alberta. Canada.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research On Animal Production

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb