Volume 8, Issue 17 (1-2018)                   rap 2018, 8(17): 80-87 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

(2018). Measurement of Rumination Activity using Chewing Activity Automatical Recorder in Dairy Cattle Fed with Alfalfa Hay with Different Particle Size . rap. 8(17), 80-87. doi:10.29252/rap.8.17.80
URL: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-870-en.html
Abstract:   (3287 Views)
In order to design, manufactur and use chewing activity automatical recorder and more accurate assessment of livestock nutrition from 8 Holstein dairy cattle were used with similar production, weight, age, breed and health in change over design 2×2 in two 21-day periods (2 weeks to adapt to the diet and 7 days for sampling). Treatments were 2 diets with the same chemical composition and different alfalfa hay particle size. The geometric mean of coarse and fine alfalfa hay, and geometric mean of two experimental rations were 3.09, 4.65, 2.91, and 3.6 mm, respectively. Animal chewing activity was recorded with visual observation and chewing activity automatically recorder. Rumination time in cows fed fine particle size was lower (P= 0.0159). Eating time was not significant different by visual observation and chewing activity automatical recorder. The jaw displacement during each a rumination meal was 334.34 and 295.47 cm for fine and coarse diet, respectively (P= 0.0001). The each rumination time In this study was ranged from 68.93 to 55.33 seconds for diets containing fine and coarse particles (P= 0.0001). The chewing of a rumination meal was reduced by increasing of particle size. The movement of jaw in one second of rumination was 4.86 and 5.34 for diets containing fine and coarse particles, respectively (P= 0.1706). The degree of displacement in a jaw movement of one minute of rumination did not change with increasing feed particles size (P= 0.1706). The jaw movements in resting time between each meal of rumination were 4.61 and 4.46 seconds for fine and coarse diets. In current experiment, In addition to evaluating the chewing activity automatical recorder was confirmed accuracy and the precision of its operation.
Full-Text [PDF 845 kb]   (3592 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/01/10 | Accepted: 2018/01/10 | Published: 2018/01/10

References
1. Albright, J.L. 1993. Feeding behavior of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 76: 485-498. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77369-5]
2. Bal, M.A., R.D. Shaver, A.G. Jirovec, K.J. Shinners and J.G. Coors. 2000. Crop processing and chop length of corn silage: Effects on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 83: 1264-1273. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74993-9]
3. Baumont, R., M. Doreau, S. Ingrand and I. Veissier. 2006. Feeding and mastication behaviour in ruminants. In: Feeding in domestic vertebrates: from structure to behaviour (ed: Bels, V.), 84-107. Cabi International. Wallingford, UK.
4. Beauchemin, K.A., W.Z. Yang and L.M. Rode. 2003. Effects of particle size of alfalfa based dairy cow diets on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 86: 630-643. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73641-8]
5. Chambers, A.R.M., J. Hodgson, J.A. Milne. 1981. The development and use of equipment for the automatic recording of ingestive behaviour in sheep and cattle. Grass Forage Science, 36: 97-105. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1981.tb01545.x]
6. Derrick, R.W., G. Moseley, D. Wilman. 1993. Intake, by sheep, and digestibility of chickweed, dandelion, dock, ribwort and spurrey, compared with perennial ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120: 51-61. [DOI:10.1017/S0021859600073585]
7. DeVries, T.J., K.A. Beauchemin, F. Dohme, K.S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein. 2009. Repeated ruminal acidosis challenges in lactating dairy cows at high and low risk for developing acidosis: Feeding, ruminating and lying behavior. Journal of Dairy Science, 92: 5067-5078. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2009-2102]
8. González, L.A., B.J. Tolkamp, M.P. Coffey, A. Ferret, I. Kyriazakis. 2008. Changes in feeding behavior as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 91: 1017-1028. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2007-0530]
9. Hutjens, M. 2008. Feeding Guide. 3rd ed. W. D. Hoards and sons company, United States of America.
10. Huzzey, J.M., D.M. Veira, D.M. Weary and M.A.G. Von Keyserlingk. 2007. Prepartum behavior and dry matter intake identify dairy cows at risk for metritis. Journal of Dairy Science, 90: 3220-3233. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2006-807]
11. Karimzade, S.M., M. Rezaei and A. Teimori. 2015. Design, manufacturing and evaluation of automated device recording chewing activity for identify eating, ruminating and chewing activity behavior in dairy cow. Journal of Ruminant Research, 3(2): 59-76 (In Persian).
12. Kononoff, P.J., A.J. Heinrichs and D.R. Buckmaster. 2003. Modification of Penn State forage and total mixed ration particle separator and the effects of moisture content on its measurements. Journal of Dairy Science, 86: 1858-1863. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73773-4]
13. Krause, K.M., D.K. Combs and K.A. Beauchemin. 2002. Effects of forage particle size and grain fermentability in midlactation cows. I. Milk production and diet digestibility. Journal of Dairy Science, 85: 1936-1946. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74270-7]
14. Krause, K.M. and G.R. Oetzel. 2006. Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: A review. Anim. Feed Science, Technol. 126: 215-236. [DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.08.004]
15. Lammers, B.P., D.R. Buckmaster and A.J. Heinrichs. 1996. A simple method for the analysis of particle sizes of forage and total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science, 79: 922-928. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76442-1]
16. Lindgren, E. 2009. Validation of rumination equipment and the role of rumination in dairy cow time budgets. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Department of Animal Nutrition and Management.
17. Mertens, D.R. 1997. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 80: 1463-1481. [DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76075-2]
18. Mialon, M.M., C. Martin, F. Garcia, J.B. Menassol, H. Dubroeucq, I. Veissier and D. Micol. 2008. Effects of the forage-to-concentrate ratio of the diet on feeding behaviour in young Blond d'Aquitaine bull. Animal. 2: 1682-1691. [DOI:10.1017/S1751731108002905]
19. Norgaard, P., E. Nadeau and A.T. Randby. 2010. A new Nordic evaluation system for diets fed to dairy cows: A meta-analysis. Pages 112-120 in Modelling Nutrient Digestion and Utilisation in Farm Animals. D. Sauvant, J. Van Milgen, P. Faverdin and N. Friggens, ed. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands. [DOI:10.3920/978-90-8686-712-7_12]
20. NRC. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
21. Nydegger, F., L. Gygax and W. Egli. 2011. Automatic measurement of rumination and feeding activity using a pressure sensor. Agrarforschung Switzerland, 2: 60-65.
22. Penning, P.D. 1983. A technique to record automatically some aspects of grazing and ruminating behavior in sheep, Grass and Forage Science, 38: 89-96. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1983.tb01626.x]
23. Ruckebusch, Y., L. Bueno. 1978. An analysis of ingestive behaviour and activity of cattle under field conditions.Applied Animal Ethology, 4: 301-313. [DOI:10.1016/0304-3762(78)90002-0]
24. SAS Institute Incorporated. 2000. SAS Software, release 8.1. SAS Institute Incorporated, Cary, NC, USA.
25. Schirmann, K., M.A.G. Von, Keyserlingk, D.M. Weary, D.M. Veira and W. Heuwieser. 2009. Technical note: Validation of a system for monitoring rumination in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 92: 6052-6055. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2009-2361]
26. Sjaastad, Ø.V.K. Hove and O. Sand. 2003. Physiology of domestic animals, pp. Scandinavian Veterinary Press. Oslo, 507-527
27. Stobbs, T.H. and L.J. Cowper. 1972. Automatic measurement of the jaw movements of dairy cows during grazing and rumination. Tropical Grasslands, 6: 107-112.
28. Yang, W.Z. and K.A. Beauchemin. 2007. Altering physically effective fiber intake through forage proportion and particle length: Chewing and ruminal pH. Journal of Dairy Science, 90: 2826-2838. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2007-0032]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research On Animal Production

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb