1. Ahmadi, Z., F. Ghafouri-Kesbi and P. Zamani. 2021. Assessing the performance of a novel method for genomic selection: rrBLUP method6. Journal of Genetics, 100: 24. [
DOI:10.1007/s12041-021-01275-5]
2. Aliloo, H., J.E. Pryce, O. González-Recio, B.G. Cocks and B.J. Hayes. 2016. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits. Genetic Selection Evolution, 48:8. [
DOI:10.1186/s12711-016-0186-0]
3. Baneh, H., A. Nejati Javaremi and G.H. Rahimi. 2017. Genomic evaluation of threshold traits with different genetic architecture using bayesian approaches. Research on Animal Production, 8:149-154. [
DOI:10.29252/rap.8.15.149]
4. De los Campos, G and P. Perez Rodriguez. 2020. BGLR: Bayesian generalized linear regression. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BGLR/BGLR.pdf
5. Doublet, A.C., P. Croiseau, S. Fritz, A. Michenet, C. Hozé, C. Danchin-Burge, D. Laloë and G. Restoux. 2019. The impact of genomic selection on genetic diversity and genetic gain in three French dairy cattle breeds. Genetics Selection Evolution, 51: 52. [
DOI:10.1186/s12711-019-0495-1]
6. Ebrahimi, K., G.R. Dashab, H. Faraji-Arough and M. Rokouei. 2018. Estimation of additive and non-additive genetic variances of body weight in crossbreed populations of the Japanese quail. Poultry Science, 1: 46-55. [
DOI:10.3382/ps/pey357]
7. Fernando, R.L. and M. Grossman.1989. Marker-assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2: 246-477. [
DOI:10.1186/1297-9686-21-4-467]
8. Ghafouri-Kesbi, F. 2014. Application of machine learning methods in genomic evaluation and studying the effect of genotype imputation on prediction accuracy of genomic breeding values. Ph.D. thesis. Sari University of Agriculture and Natural resources, Sari, Iran.
9. Ghasemi-Siab, M., S. Varkoohi and M.H. Banabazi. 2021. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery on transcriptomes of American Holstein and Pakistanian Cholistani Cows. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 13: 313-319.
10. Goddard, M. 2009. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica, 136: 245-257. [
DOI:10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0]
11. Hayes B.J., P.M. Visscher and M.E. Goddard. 2009. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genetics Research, 91: 47-60. [
DOI:10.1017/S0016672308009981]
12. Jasouri, M., P. Zamani and S. Alijani. 2017. Dominance genetic and maternal effects for genetic evaluation of egg production traits in dualpurpose chicken. British Poultry Science, 58: 498-505. [
DOI:10.1080/00071668.2017.1336748]
13. Legarra, A. and A. Reverter. 2018. Semi-parametric estimates of population accuracy and bias of predictions of breeding values and future phenotypes using the LR method. Genetic Selection Evolution, 50: 53. [
DOI:10.1186/s12711-018-0426-6]
14. Macedo, F.L., O.F. Christensen, J.M. Astruc, I. Aguilar, Y. Masuda and A. Legarra. 2020. Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups. Genetic Selection Evolution. 52: 1-10. [
DOI:10.1186/s12711-020-00567-1]
15. Meuwissen, T.H.E., B.J. Hayes and M.E. Goddard. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 157: 1819-1829. [
DOI:10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819]
16. Mohammadi, Y. 2019. Accuracy of genomic selection using models with additive effects for productive traits in Iranian Holstein cows. The second international conference and the third national conference on agriculture, environment and food security. Jiroft University, Jiroft, Iran.
17. Mohammadi, Y. and M. Sattaei Mokhtari. 2018. Genomic selection accuracy parametric and nonparametric statistical methods with additive and dominance genetic architectures. Research on Animal Production, 8: 161-167 (In Persian). [
DOI:10.29252/rap.8.18.161]
18. Morais, Jr, O., J. Duarte, F. Breseghello, A. Coelho, T. Borba, J. Aguiar and O. Morais. 2017. Relevance of additive and nonadditive genetic relatedness for genomic prediction in rice population under recurrent selection breeding. Genetics and Molecular Research, 16: gmr16039849. [
DOI:10.4238/gmr16039849]
19. Neves, H.H.R., R. Carvalheiro and S.A. Queiroz. 2012. A comparison of statistical methods for genomic selection in a mice population. BMC Genetics, 13: 100. [
DOI:10.1186/1471-2156-13-100]
20. Sadeghi, S.A.T., M. Rokoue., M. Vafaye Valleh, M.A. Abbasi and H. Faraji-Arough. 2019. Estimation of additive and non-additive genetic variance component for growth traits in Adani goats. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 52: 733-742. [
DOI:10.1007/s11250-019-02064-0]
21. Spelman, R. and D. Garrick. 1997. Utilization of marker assisted selection in a commercial dairy cow population. Livestock Production Science, 47: 139-147. [
DOI:10.1016/S0301-6226(96)01405-4]
22. Sun, C., X.L. Wu, K.A. Weigel, G.J.M. Rosa, S. Bauck, B.W. Woodward, R.D. Schinabel and J.F. Taylor. 2012. An ensemble-based approach to imputation of moderate-density genotypes for genomic selection with application to Angus cattle. Genetic Research, 94: [
DOI:10.1017/S001667231200033X]
23. Technow, F. 2013. hypred: simulation of genomic data in applied genetics. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/hypred/index.html.
24. Vanaei, F., F. Ghafouri-Kesbi, A. Ahmadi and P. Zamani. 2022. Imputation of Missing Genotypes with Intelegent K-Nearest Neighbore Algorithm. Research on Animal Production, 35: 130-138. [
DOI:10.52547/rap.13.35.130]
25. VanRaden, P.M. 2008. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal of Dairy Science, 91: 4414-4423. [
DOI:10.3168/jds.2007-0980]
26. Varona, L., A. Legarra, M.A. Toro and Z.G. Vitezica. 2018. Non-additive effects in genomic selection. Frontiers in Genetics, 9: 78. [
DOI:10.3389/fgene.2018.00078]
27. Wang, C.L., X.D. Ding, J.Y. Wang, J.F. Liu, W.X. Fu, Z. Zhang, J. Yin and Q. Zhang. 2013. Bayesian methods for estimating GEBVs of threshold traits. Heredity, 110: 213-219. [
DOI:10.1038/hdy.2012.65]
28. Yadav, S., X. Wei, P. Joyce, F. Atkin, E. Deomano, Y. Sun, L.T. Nguyen, E.M. Rosa, Cavallaro, T. K.S. Aitken, B.J. Hayes and K.P. Vos-Fels. 2021. Improved genomic prediction 1100 of clonal performance in sugarcane by exploiting non-additive genetic effects. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 134: 2235-2252. [
DOI:10.1007/s00122-021-03822-1]