Volume 8, Issue 18 (3-2018)                   rap 2018, 8(18): 30-37 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Abstract:   (3827 Views)
Effect of different levels of date waste were studied on performance and immune responses of 240 Ross 308 broiler chicks in a completely randomized design with 5 treatments and 4 replicates and 12 birds in each replicate. The whole date waste were analyzed for chemical compositions and gradual levels of 0 (control), 5, 10, 15 and 20 percent of that were included into the diets which fed broilers for 42 days. Growth performance was recorded, weekly. Humoral immune response was evaluated by intramuscular injection of 0.1 ml sheep red blood cell (SRBC) 25 percent suspension on days 8 and 22 of age and serum antibody levels produced in response to SRBC was measured on days 21, 28, 35 and 42. Cellular immune response was assessed by intradermal injection of phytohemaglutinin on day 16. Using date waste in diet had no significant effect on daily feed intake. Daily weight gain was linearly decreased by increasing the levels of dates waste in diet (P<0.05). The birds were fed 20 percent date waste in diet had the highest feed conversion ratio compared with the control group. Inclusion of 10 percent or more date waste in diet increased total anti˗SRBC titer and IgM on days 35 and 42 (P<0.05). Cellular immune response to phytohemaglutinin was not affected by any inclusion rate of date waste. The results of current study indicated that using 10 percent date waste in broilers diet had not any negative effect on performance, which seems 10 percent level can improve humoral immune response of broilers.   
Full-Text [PDF 734 kb]   (1797 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/02/28 | Revised: 2018/03/3 | Accepted: 2018/02/28 | Published: 2018/02/28

References
1. Abdelkariem, A.L. 2009. The Influence of different levels of discarded dates substitute maize on broiler performance., M.Sc. Thesis, University of Dongola, Dongula, Sudan. 92 pp.
2. Abul Abbas, K., A.H. Lichtman and J.S. Pober. 2007. Cellular and molecular immunology. 6th edn, W.B. Saunders Company, Wallingford, UK. 566 pp.
3. Al-Farsi, M.A. and C.Y. Lee. 2008. Optimization of phenolics and dietary fibre extraction from date seeds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 108: 977-985. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.12.009]
4. Asadi, M., M. Mohammadi and M. Roostaei-Alimehr. 2014. Effect of alcoholic Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) extract on performance and immune response of broilers. Research of Animal Production, 9: 36-49 (In Persian).
5. Bauer, R. 1996. Echinacea drugs, effects and active ingredients. Economic and Medicinal Plants Research, 90: 110-115.
6. Benmeddour, Z., E. Mehinagic, L.E. Meurlay and D. Louaileche. 2012. Phenolic composition and antioxidant capacities of ten Algerian date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars: A comparative study. Journal of Functional Foods, 5(1): 346-354. [DOI:10.1016/j.jff.2012.11.005]
7. Besharati, Z., M. Mohammadi, M. Roostaei-Alimehr and Y. Hamidoghli. 2015. Effect of Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) alcoholic extract on performance and humoral immunity response in broilers. Research of Animal Production, 11: 51-59 (In Persian).
8. El-Deek, A.A., Y.A. Attia and M.A. Al-Harthi. 2010. Whole inedible date in the grower-finisher broiler diets and the impact on productive performance, nutrient digestibility and meat quality. Animal, 4(10): 1647-52. [DOI:10.1017/S1751731110000820]
9. FAO Statistical yearbook. 2013. World Food and Agriculture.
10. Farrell, D. 2005. Matching poultry production with available fee resources: issues and constraints. World's Poultry Science Journal, 61: 298-307. [DOI:10.1079/WPS200456]
11. Gholamrezaie Sani, L., M. Mohammadi, J. Jalali Sendi, S.A. Abolghsemi and M. Roostaie-Ali Mehr. 2013. Extract and leaf powder effect of Artemisia annua on performance, cellular and humoral immunity in broilers. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, 14(1): 15-20.
12. Goel, V., C. Chang, J.V. Slama, R. Barton, R. Gahler and T.K. Basu. 2002. Alkylamides of Echinacea purpurea stimulate alveolar macrophage function in normal rats. International Journal of Immunopharmacology, 2: 381-387. [DOI:10.1016/S1567-5769(01)00163-1]
13. Ghorbani, M.R., A. Aghaei, S. Salari and M.R. Jamali. 2017. Effect of different levels of date waste on the performance of laying hens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, doi: 22067/ijasr.v3i1.56174 (In Persian).
14. Hashempour, M. 1999. Date treasures. First edn, Agricultural Education Press. Tehran, Iran, 668 pp (In Persian).
15. Jumah, H.F., I.I Al-Azzawi and S.A. Al-Hashimi. 1973. Some nutritional aspects of feeding ground date pits for broilers. Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, 8(2): 139.
16. Kamel, B.S. 1981. Nutritional value of whole dates and date pits in broiler Ration. Poultry Science, 60(5): 1006-1011. [DOI:10.3382/ps.0601005]
17. Karasawa, K., Y. Uzuhashi, M. Hirota and H. Otani. 2011. Matured fruit extract of date palm tree (Phoenixdactylifera L.) stimulates the cellular immune system in mice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(20): 11287-11293. [DOI:10.1021/jf2029225]
18. Khaleghi, H., N. Afzali and M. Zaghari. 2012. Effect of different levels of Byprolive D (Date-by-Product) with and without enzyme on some characters of broiler chickens. In: proc. Fifth Animal Science Congress. Esfahan, September 2012. 35 pp (In Persian).
19. Nanekarani, S., M. Goodarzi and M. Heidari. 2012. The effect of different levels of Spearmint (Mentha Spicata) extract on immune system and blood parameters of broiler chickens. APCBEE Procedia, 4: 135-139. [DOI:10.1016/j.apcbee.2012.11.023]
20. Nie, W. and Y.X. Zhang. 1999. Progress of the immunomodulating effect of polysaccharides and their mechanism. Chinese Pharmacology Bulletin, 15: 3-15.
21. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. edn. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
22. Puri, A., R. Sahai, K.L. Singh, R.P. Saxena, J.S. Tandon and K.C. Saxena. 2000. Immunostimulant activity of dry fruits and plant materials used in Indian traditional medical system for mothers after child birth and invalids. Journal of Ethno pharmacology, 71: 89-92. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00181-6]
23. Quanzhen, W. and C. Jian. 2011. Perspectives and utilization technologies of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.): Areview. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10:1966-1977.
24. SAS Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc. Cary. NC.
25. Shahsavari, S. and M. Salar Moeini. 2010. The feeding value of waste whole date either with or without enzyme supplementation on broiler performance. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 2: 145-152 (In Persian).
26. Spence, K.M. 2002. In vivo evaluation of immunomodulatory properties of crude extracts of Echinacea species and fractions isolated from Echinacea purpurea. PhD Thesis, University of southern Queensland, Queensland, Australia.110 pp.
27. Zangiabadi, H. and M. Torki. 2010. The effect of a β-mannanase-based enzyme on growth performance and humoral immune response of broiler chickens fed diets containing graded levels of whole dates. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42: 1209-1217. [DOI:10.1007/s11250-010-9550-1]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.